ALERT: Your health is top priority. We’re committed to providing reliable COVID-19 resources to keep you informed and safe.

AbbVie Wins Federal Trial Over Testosterone Drug AndroGel


Editors carefully fact-check all Drugwatch content for accuracy and quality.

Drugwatch has a stringent fact-checking process. It starts with our strict sourcing guidelines.

We only gather information from credible sources. This includes peer-reviewed medical journals, reputable media outlets, government reports, court records and interviews with qualified experts.

blood clots

A federal jury in Chicago has refused to award money to an Arizona man who blames the testosterone-replacement drug AndroGel for his pulmonary embolisms.

Jurors on Jan. 26, 2018, handed up a verdict in favor of AndroGel maker AbbVie, holding that the company is not responsible for blood clots Robert Nolte, of Sierra Vista, Arizona, suffered in his lungs.

According to Nolte’s 2014 lawsuit, he was prescribed AndroGel from around June 2012 until the following November.

AbbVie argued in a court filing that Nolte had failed to prove that AndroGel caused his injuries or that he was influenced to take the drug by AbbVie advertising.

Nolte’s lawsuit is one of 6,000 pending in federal court that generally accuse AbbVie of manufacturing a medical condition called “Low T,” with symptoms that are actually the normal signs of aging.

Patients say AbbVie and other drugmakers pushed their testosterone-replacement therapy to treat the bogus condition, putting men at risk for serious injuries.

The ruling in Notle’s case as well as other recent verdicts could influence the outcome of thousands of undecided testosterone-therapy cases.

“Our trial team did an excellent job with a very complicated case,” Christopher Seeger, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in federal litigation, told Reuters after the Nolte verdict. “We look forward to the next trial and holding AbbVie accountable for putting profits before safety.”

Multimillion-Dollar AndroGel Verdicts

Nolte’s lawsuit was the third federal case to go to trial involving claims that AbbVie marketed a dangerous drug and downplayed the risks.

Two previous juries handed up multimillion-dollar verdicts against AbbVie.

In one case, the presiding judge overturned a $150 million award. The jury did not find AndroGel caused a heart attack suffered by plaintiff Jesse Mitchell, a resident of Oregon. But jurors found that AbbVie’s conduct warranted a hefty punishment, or punitive damages.

A $140 million verdict in favor of plaintiff Jeffrey Konrad, of Tennessee, is on appeal. Konrad suffered a heart attack in 2010. He had taken AndroGel for three months. The verdict included $140,000 in compensatory damages in addition to $140 million in punitive damages against AbbVie.

Testosterone Multidistrict Litigation

The Nolte, Mitchell and Konrad cases were the first three bellwether trials in the testosterone-replacement therapy multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving AndroGel.

Bellwether trials are designed to guide the parties in potential settlement negotiations by giving them an idea of how cases will go.

More than 6,000 lawsuits pending in federal court over injuries allegedly caused by testosterone-replacement-therapy drugs have been consolidated in the MDL in Chicago.

Federal courts use MDLs to manage large numbers of lawsuits involving similar issues. It allows a single judge to make consistent pretrial rulings that apply to all the cases and to preside over bellwether trials.

Other Testosterone Verdicts and Settlements

A bellwether trial in November ended in a win for Endo International. That case involved the company’s drug, Testim. The Tennessee man who filed that lawsuit, Steve Holtsclaw, claimed Testim caused his heart attack.

Endo’s Auxilium unit settled a lawsuit in state court in Pennsylvania. That case involved claims by Robert Hoehl that Testim caused his stroke.

Drug maker Eli Lilly notified the court in December that it reached a global settlement in about 400 cases involving its testosterone drug Axiron. Details of the settlement were not released.

Elaine Silvestrini
Written By Elaine Silvestrini Writer

Elaine Silvestrini is an award-winning journalist with 30 years of experience covering state and federal court systems. She joined Drugwatch in 2017. Her coverage for Drugwatch has been cited in the CDC’s Public Health Law News and the USA Today Network. Some of her qualifications include:

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention certificates in Health Literacy
  • Experience as an assistant investigator for the Federal Public Defender
  • Loyola Law School Journalist Law School Fellowship
Edited By
Emily Miller
Emily Miller Managing Editor

5 Cited Research Articles writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.

  1. Raymond, N., et al. (2018, January 26). AbbVie Wins U.S. Trial in Lawsuit over AndroGel’s Risks. Retrieved from
  2. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (2014, October 17). Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. Robert Nolte et al vs. AbbVie Inc. et al. Case 1:14-cv-08135. Retrieved from
  3. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (2018, January 26). Judgment in Civil Case. Robert Nolte et al vs. AbbVie Inc. et al. Case 1:14-cv-08135. Retrieved from
  4. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (2018, January 25). Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Judgement as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(A). Robert Nolte et al vs. AbbVie Inc. et al. Case 1:14-cv-08135. Retrieved from
  5. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidstrict Litigation. (2018, January 16). MDL Statistics Report – Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by District. Retrieved from
View All Sources
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

Drugwatch's trusted legal partners support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.

(888) 645-1617