Home Baby Formula Lawsuits Similac Lawsuit

Similac Lawsuit

Parents of premature infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) filed Similac lawsuits claiming the formula caused the disease. Lawsuits claim Abbott didn’t warn about NEC risk. In July 2024, a Missouri jury awarded $495 million in damages to a mother whose infant died from NEC after using Similac.

See If You Qualify for a Baby Formula Lawsuit

If your baby developed NEC after being fed Similac or Enfamil, you may be entitled to compensation. Get a free case review today.

  • A+BBB Rating
  • 4.9 StarGoogle Reviews

We value your privacy. By clicking REVIEW MY CASE, you agree to our privacy policy and disclaimer. After submitting, you will be contacted by one or more of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners (including autodialed and prerecorded calls or text/SMS messages). Msg. and data rates apply. Your consent to text messaging is not required for a case review and you may opt out of text messages at any time by texting STOP. This is legal advertising.

  • A+BBB Rating
  • 4.9 StarGoogle Reviews
Fact Checked
Expert Verified

Our content is developed and backed by respected legal, medical and scientific experts. More than 30 contributors, including product liability attorneys and board-certified physicians, have reviewed our website to ensure it’s medically sound and legally accurate.

Why Trust Drugwatch?
Drugwatch is trusted
legal help when you need it most.

Drugwatch has provided people injured by harmful drugs and devices with reliable answers and experienced legal help since 2009. Brought to you by Wilson & Peterson LLP, we've pursued justice for more than 20,000 families and secured $324 million in settlements and verdicts against negligent manufacturers.

More than 30 contributors, including mass tort attorneys and board-certified doctors, have reviewed our website and added their unique perspectives to ensure you get the most updated and highest quality information.

Drugwatch.com is AACI-certified as a trusted medical content website and is produced by lawyers, a patient advocate and award-winning journalists whose affiliations include the American Bar Association and the American Medical Writers Association.

About Drugwatch.com

  • 15+ Years of Advocacy
  • $324 Million Recovered for Clients
  • 20,000 Families Helped
  • A+ BBB Rating
  • 4.9 Stars from Google Reviews
Learn More About Us

Testimonials

I found Drugwatch to be very helpful with finding the right lawyers. We had the opportunity to share our story as well, so that more people can be aware of NEC. We are forever grateful for them.
Chasity P. Legal Client
  • Google Business Rating
  • BBB A+ Rating Logo
Client Reviews and Testimonials

I found Drugwatch to be very helpful with finding the right lawyers. We had the ...

Chasity P. Legal Client
Similac Lawsuit Key Takeaways
  • Eligibility: If your child developed NEC after consuming Similac cow’s milk baby formula or human milk fortifiers, you may qualify for a lawsuit.
  • MDL Case Count: As of October 2025, 761 Similac and Enfamil cases were pending as part of multidistrict litigation in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Master docket number: 1:22-cv-00071).
  • Recent Similac Verdicts: A Missouri jury awarded $495 million in July 2024.
  • Bellwether Status: The next bellwether is scheduled for Nov. 3, 2025. Rebekah Etienne & Deondrick Brown, Sr. v. Abbott Laboratories (Case number: 1:22-cv-02001) is the case.
  • Filing Deadlines: Statute of limitations can range from one to six years, depending on the state.

What Is NEC and Why It Matters in Similac Lawsuits

NEC (necrotizing enterocolitis) is a potentially deadly intestinal disorder that primarily affects premature babies, and it’s the focus of Similac lawsuits. Plaintiffs say Abbott Laboratories failed to adequately disclose the heightened risk of NEC in preterm infants fed cow’s milk-based Similac formulas.

Studies, including one published in a 1990 issue of the Lancet, found that NEC was six to 10 times more common in formula-fed babies than in those who drank breast milk. It was as much as 20 times more common in babies who were only fed formula.

Did you know?
A study showed that NEC is 6 to 10 times more common for infants that are exclusively fed formula.

The first symptoms of NEC are bloating, trouble feeding, vomiting and bloody stool. It’s fatal in 10% to 50% of cases. When major issues like sepsis and perforation occur, mortality is close to 100%.

Most NEC cases can be treated by stopping feedings, using an orogastric tube and administering IV fluids and antibiotics. The situation is monitored via frequent exams and X-rays. However, if medical interventions aren’t effective or symptoms worsen, the infant may need surgery.

Babies who survive NEC — especially those who need surgery — may have long-term problems such as growth and developmental difficulties.

Why Are Parents Filing Similac Lawsuits?

Parents, families and caregivers are filing Similac lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories because they claim the maker of Similac baby formula failed to warn them that its cow’s milk products could increase the risk of preemies or low birth weight infants developing necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC.

According to Similac lawsuits, defendants knew or should have known of the NEC risk because studies as far back as 1990 showed that NEC was more common in preterm infants who consumed formula versus breast milk. One study said it was six to 10 times more common in exclusively formula-fed babies than in babies who were breastfed. Another study put that number at a 20 times greater risk for preemies fed formula versus breast milk.

Example Claims in Similac Lawsuits
  • Breach of warranty
  • Negligence
  • Failure to warn about the risk of NEC
  • The product is dangerous and defective

Parents and caregivers are seeking compensation for medical bills, their child’s loss of quality of life, funeral expenses for infants who died from NEC complications and other damages.

“The companies who manufacture these products often intentionally mislabel and misrepresent the contents of the products both to the public at large and to the health care community, passing off these deadly products as something similar to or even superior to human breast milk.”
Singh v. Abbott Laboratories

Shelbi Singh’s lawsuit claims defendants knew about the health risks of ingesting cow’s milk formulas, such as NEC and death, but they didn’t warn parents or medical providers: “The companies who manufacture these products often intentionally mislabel and misrepresent the contents of the products both to the public at large and to the health care community, passing off these deadly products as something similar to or even superior to human breast milk.”

Besides failing to warn, plaintiffs say the defendants didn’t provide instructions or guidance on how to properly use cow’s milk formulas to lower NEC risk or avoid infant death.

Similac Formulas Named in Lawsuits

All Similac baby formula products made with cow’s milk may potentially be named in Similac lawsuits, according to our legal partners.

Some of these products, such as Similac Human Milk Fortifier, may have names that don’t sound like cow’s milk is an ingredient. Parents and caregivers should read the product’s ingredients label to look for cow’s milk.

Similac formulas named in lawsuits include:
  • Similac Special Care
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier
  • Similac NeoSure
  • Similac Alimentum
  • Similac Alimentum Expert Care
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier Concentrated Liquid
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier Powder
  • Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier
  • Similac Special Care 20
  • Similac Special Care 24
  • Similac Special Care 24 High Protein
  • Similac Special Care 30
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier Hydrolyzed Protein- Concentrated Liquid

If you aren’t sure whether the Similac formula your baby consumed qualifies, speak to a lawyer. Lawyers taking Similac lawsuit cases can tell you whether the formula is part of ongoing lawsuits.

Keep any leftover Similac baby formula for evidence in your potential case. If you have medical records and receipts, those will also be important evidence in any NEC lawsuit claim you file.

How To File a Similac Lawsuit

If you are considering filing a Similac lawsuit, we recommend that you hire an experienced lawyer instead of filing on your own. Baby formula lawsuits are complex, especially since they are now a mass tort and in multidistrict litigation. Our legal partners can help walk you through the complicated and emotional process of getting compensation for your baby’s sickness or death from Similac-induced NEC.

General Steps To Filing a Similac Lawsuit
  1. Seek a free consultation with a baby formula lawsuit lawyer.
  2. Your lawyer will file your Similac lawsuit.
  3. Your lawyer will collect all evidence to help strengthen your claim against Abbott.
  4. Your lawyer will walk you through any necessary court filings.
  5. Your lawyer will argue your case in court or negotiate a settlement on your behalf.

An experienced product liability lawyer can help you fight large companies such as Abbott. They have the knowledge and resources to take on big corporations. For example, our legal partners have over 20 years of experience in fighting for plaintiffs harmed through the negligence of powerful corporations.

Our legal partners can help take the stress out of the filing process so you can concentrate on healing with your family.

See if You Qualify for a Lawsuit Our Partners

Our Trusted Legal Partners

Drugwatch partners with trusted law firms to help you take legal action. After submitting the form, one of Drugwatch's partners will contact you for a free case review.

simmons hanly conroy law firm logo weitz and luxenberg logo sokolove law firm logo levin papantonio rafferty law firm logo nigh goldenberg raso and vaughn law firm logo morgan & morgan logo the ferraro law firm logo meirowitz & wasserberg law firm logo

Abbott’s Defense and Causation Debate

Abbott’s defense against NEC lawsuits is that while there is evidence that human milk protects against NEC, there is no evidence that their preterm formulas cause NEC. Instead, they argue the formulas provide nourishment that may otherwise not be available. They add that premature babies already face a range of serious health risks just by being born prematurely.

So far, Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer has issued summary judgment in the case of Ericka Mar, whose daughter died after feeding on Similac formula. Summary judgment means the case was dismissed before going to trial.

Pallmeyer found that Abbott could not be held liable because there wasn’t enough available evidence to show there was an alternative to Similac at the time of Mar’s child’s death or that cow’s milk in the formula caused NEC.

Future lawsuits will have to provide more evidence on causation and the availability of alternatives to the relevant formulas.

Defense vs. Plaintiff Arguments
DefensePlaintiff
Preterm infants are already at increased risk of health problems. Human milk is protective against NEC, but formulas do not cause NEC. Defendants knew cow’s milk-based formula increased the risk of developing NEC. Despite this, they aggressively marketed the formulas for hospital use and didn’t adequately warn of the risks.

Do I Qualify for a Similac Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Similac lawsuit if you meet the following criteria below. We recommend you contact our legal partners for a free case evaluation to make sure you qualify for your child’s specific case.

You may qualify to file a Similac lawsuit if:
  • Your child developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
  • Your child consumed formula that contained cow’s milk protein
  • Your child was born prematurely or with a low birth weight

Lawyers will require medical records and other evidence showing that your child was diagnosed with NEC after consuming Similac cow’s milk baby formula. This includes NICU feeding logs, formula packaging, receipts for purchasing formula and doctor’s notes.

Similac NEC Lawsuit Eligibility Checklist
  • Was the infant born prematurely?
  • Was the infant fed Similac cow’s milk-based formula (in the NICU or after discharge)?
  • Was the infant later diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)?
  • Did the infant require surgery, hospitalization or other treatment for NEC?
  • Is there medical documentation confirming the use of Similac formula and the NEC diagnosis?
  • Are you the legal guardian or parent qualified to file the claim on the infant's behalf?

This checklist could help you prepare for a free case evaluation with a lawyer. If your child developed NEC after consuming Similac cow’s milk formula, it’s a good idea to speak to a lawyer to see if you qualify for a lawsuit. Only a licensed attorney can advise you about your eligibility for a Similac NEC lawsuit.

Drugwatch Can Connect You With a Trusted Legal Partner if Your Child Developed NEC After Being Fed Similac Baby Formula. Lawsuits have been filed claiming that Abbott Laboratories, the maker of Similac, failed to warn customers of the serious risk of NEC tied to some of their products when fed to premature infants. Last year, the family of a baby girl who was fed Similac and developed NEC was awarded $495 million.
EXPAND

Similac vs. Enfamil Lawsuits

People are filing Similac and Enfamil lawsuits for similar reasons, but Similac lawsuits are being filed against Abbott Laboratories and Enfamil lawsuits are being filed against Mead Johnson. Similac and Enfamil may have slightly different baby formula ingredients, but products made with cow’s milk share the same potential risk for causing NEC in preterm infants.

Abbott Laboratories holds a slightly larger share of the U.S. baby formula market than Mead Johnson, so more babies may be fed with Similac versus Enfamil. According to The
New York Times, Abbott provides baby formula to about 47% of infants who receive benefits through the WIC supplemental nutrition program. Mead Johnson is the next largest manufacturer at 40%.

When judges formed the baby formula lawsuit multidistrict litigation in Illinois, almost all of the first lawsuits that moved to the MDL were Similac lawsuits.

Has Similac Been Recalled?

Similac has not been recalled specifically for NEC risks, but in 2022 Abbott issued a baby formula recall for products manufactured at its Sturgis plant. Some of those products included Similac baby formula.

The Abbott and Similac baby formula recalls began in February 2022. The recalls followed reports of sickness and deaths connected to potential bacterial contamination with Cronobacter sakazakii. Babies became ill after consuming Similac and other Abbott formulas, and some died.

Abbott now faces a U.S. Department of Justice criminal investigation because of the contamination at its Sturgis plant.

NEC MDL 3026 and recall class action MDL 3037 are two distinct multidistrict litigations involving infant formula. They focus on separate harms and legal claims.

MDL 3026, overseen by Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer in the Northern District of Illinois, consolidates federal lawsuits alleging that Abbott and Mead Johnson’s cow’s milk-based formulas, including Similac and Enfamil, caused NEC in premature infants. Plaintiffs in MDL 3026 seek compensation for serious injury or death linked to NEC and claim that manufacturers failed to warn about specific health risks.

In contrast, MDL 3037 addresses a nationwide class action regarding Abbott’s voluntary recall of infant formulas due to bacterial contamination concerns unrelated to NEC.

Compensation in Similac Lawsuits

Similac NEC lawsuit compensation can include substantial damages for families whose premature infants suffered severe injury or death due to NEC after consuming cow’s milk-based formula.

Compensation may include:
  • Reimbursement for past and future medical costs tied to NEC treatment, hospitalization, surgical intervention and long-term care for affected children.
  • Wrongful death damages that cover funeral expenses and loss of companionship for families who lost a child to NEC.
  • Requested funds for pain and suffering endured by both the child and their family, and for ongoing expenses of permanent disability or neurological injury.

Recent verdicts are examples of how juries value the amount of compensation possible in Similac lawsuits. In July 2024, a Missouri jury awarded $495 million — including $400 million in punitive damages and $95 million in compensatory damages — to a family whose premature infant developed NEC after consuming Similac formula.

It’s important to note that large jury verdicts don’t guarantee the amount awarded in a settlement.

But the outcome of bellwether trials (sample cases tried early in litigation) has a powerful impact on future Similac settlements. Large plaintiff verdicts could encourage defendant companies to negotiate broader settlements to avoid similar outcomes in subsequent trials.

Bellwether results help parties estimate the strength of claims and set benchmarks for resolving hundreds of pending cases.

Similac Lawsuit Compensation Outcomes

Lawyers handling NEC cases have estimated that individual compensation could be between $50,000 and over $50 million, depending on the severity of the injury and the amount of damages. Compensation may be lower for cases with mild and temporary health issues.

Similac Lawsuit Compensation Ranges
Non-fatal NEC cases$50,000 to $600,000
Permanent disability from NEC$1 million to $10 million
Death from NEC$5 million to over $50 million

Keep in mind that these are just estimates from attorneys and they are not guaranteed settlements. Case values can shift depending on the outcome of more bellwether trials and the ongoing litigation.

Drugwatch Analysis (October 2025)

Two recent summary judgement rulings in lawsuits against Abbott, the maker of Similac, could affect NEC litigation moving forward. When a judge grants a summary judgement ruling in a case, it doesn’t go to a jury, and the judge rules on the case with the evidence they have.

Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer granted summary judgement on the cases, which will effectively be dismissed, because she didn’t find evidence that there was a safer alternative to Abbott’s cow’s milk baby formula.

Now, plaintiffs will have to provide more evidence that if defendants warn about the risk, there are safer options that doctors could have recommended. A summary judgment hearing for the next bellwether trial is scheduled for Oct. 14.

Outside the MDL, a Missouri jury awarded $495 million the mother of an infant who died from NEC after consuming Similac.

Latest Similac Lawsuit Updates

As of October 2025, 761 Similac and Enfamil lawsuits are pending multidistrict litigation (MDL). MDL 3026 is before U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer in the Northern District of Illinois. One of the main defendants is Abbott Laboratories, the maker of Similac cow’s milk baby formulas. According to Similac lawsuits, Abbott knew about the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and failed to warn the public.

We’ve researched these lawsuits and have also spoken to our legal partners to bring you the following Similac lawsuit updates. Check back often to find out the litigation’s status.

Similac NEC Lawsuit Timeline

  • October 27, 2025: Abbott Wins Third Bellwether Case
    Abbott has prevailed in the third bellwether case, with the judge overseeing these cases issuing summary judgment in the formula maker's favor. This is a significant loss for the hundreds of baby formula lawsuits pending in federal court, with Abbott having now won every bellwether case before it can even advance to trial. A second wave of bellwether cases is now being prepared.
  • October 20, 2025: Plan Proposed for Next Wave of Bellwether Trials
    Abbott has proposed a plan for the next wave of baby formula bellwether trials. The company's plan calls for three trials to be held from November 2026 to February 2027. We will have to wait and see if the judge overseeing these cases approves the plan.
  • October 15, 2025: Key Hearing for Baby Formula Lawsuits This Week
    This week is a big moment for the baby formula lawsuits, with the judge overseeing these cases set to hear arguments on Abbott's summary judgment motion for the next bellwether trial. If the judge were to rule in Abbott's favor, then this would be the third straight baby formula case to fail to make it to trial. We will report back on the judge's decision as soon as it is available.
  • October 1, 2025: Second Wave of Bellwether Trials Coming in 2026
    More baby formula bellwether trials could be on the horizon. The judge overseeing these cases has directed both sides to begin working on a schedule for a second wave of bellwether trials, with the first to get underway in August 2026.
  • September 18, 2025: Summary Judgment Hearing Approaching for Bellwether Trial
    The next baby formula bellwether trial is approaching, with a summary judgment hearing scheduled for Oct. 14. Summary judgment is where the formula manufacturers ask the judge to essentially rule in their favor before the case advances to trial. This is an important moment for these lawsuits, with the judge granting summary judgment to the manufacturers in both of the previous bellwethers before this one.
  • July 2025
    The judge overseeing the baby formula lawsuits in federal court has once again granted summary judgment to Abbott in the second bellwether case. This is a notable blow for plaintiffs, with both of the first two bellwethers failing to get in front of a jury. The next bellwether was slated for November of this year. Despite these losses, baby formula lawsuits have seen huge success in state courts.
  • May 2025
    The judge overseeing the baby formula lawsuits in federal court has granted summary judgment to Abbott in the first bellwether trial. This is a significant loss for plaintiffs, with the judge noting that even if Abbott had added an NEC warning to its Similac products that it likely would not have changed how the hospital treated the infant in question.

    While the loss is an unfortunate development for plaintiffs, the litigation is far from decided. Judge Pallmeyer made clear that her reasons for ordering summary judgment cannot be directly applied to the hundreds of other pending cases. The next bellwether trial is slated for August.
  • March 2025
    The only trial win for baby formula manufacturers in the NEC litigation has been erased. A judge ordered a retrial in Abbott and Mead Johnson's win from October, citing misconduct from the defense team that could have influenced the jury's decision. Abbott and Mead Johnson plan to appeal.
  • February 2025
    The defendants in the baby formula MDL have filed for summary judgment. If approved, this could end much of the litigation involving Similac and other baby formulas in favor of the defendants. But it is unclear if the court will side with them on this issue. Plaintiffs have been awarded massive verdicts in similar cases that have gone to trial in state court.
  • October 2024
    Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson have prevailed in the latest state court baby formula trial, where both were listed as defendants. This victory is a notable shift from how litigation has played out so far, with Abbott and Mead Johnson both ordered to pay out sizable verdicts in two other state trials earlier this year.

    In the MDL, parties have proposed trial dates for the recently ordered bellwether cases. If approved, the first trial will start on May 5, 2025. The first three trials name Abbott Laboratories, makers of Similac, as the defendant.
  • September 2024
    The order has been set for the four bellwether trials in the baby formula MDL, with a case involving Similac scheduled to go to trial first. Ericka Mar, as Administratrix of the Estate of RaiLee Mar v. Abbott Laboratories leads the order, and claims premature infant RaiLee Mar died after being fed Similac in the NICU and developing NEC. Judge Pallmeyer has directed counsel to work on setting trial dates for the four cases.
  • July 2024
    Abbott suffered a loss in court this month after a Missouri jury awarded $495 million to the family of an infant girl who suffered serious complications from NEC after ingesting Abbott's premature infant formula in the NICU. This is a state court case and not related to the MDL cases, however, this verdict could still influence the course of Similar baby formula litigation in all cases, according to lawyers familiar with the cases. The jury awarded $95 million in damages and $400 million in punitive damages. Abbott will try to have the verdict overturned.
  • June 2024
    We have exciting news for this month regarding bellwether trial dates. Judge Pallmeyer issued an order that outlined the proposed schedule for the first bellwether test trial in the MDL. Judge Pallmeyer gave a deadline of August 2024 to close on fact discovery. After that, both sides will schedule depositions and other motions to prepare for trial.

    The tentative bellwether test date will be in May 2025. In our experience reporting on mass tort bellwether trials, it isn’t uncommon for these dates to evolve, and the date could change. There is also a possibility of defendants offering a settlement before trial. This is the first bellwether in the MDL, and it could set the tone for the litigation. An Illinois state court trial in March 2024 ended in a $60 million plaintiff’s verdict, and this result could also play into the fate of the MDL cases.
  • May 2024
    Judge Pallmeyer issued an order that required all plaintiffs to provide evidence that injured infants consumed Enfamil or another Mead Johnson product before naming the company in a lawsuit. So far, there isn’t a similar order for Similac plaintiffs.
  • February 2024
    Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer scheduled hearings that involved several plaintiffs in MDL 3026 on sealed/private motions for March 2024.
  • April 2023
    Parties needed to submit a brief on outstanding discovery proceeding issues to the court by April 25, 2023.
  • March 2023
    The judge scheduled Science Day proceedings for May 3, 2023, to allow the parties to present an overview of scientific and medical theories to the court.
  • December 2022
    Defendants selected four cases for bellwether test trials: Clarke, Cresap, Inman and Mar.
  • October 2022
    Plaintiffs selected four bellwether test trials: Brown, Diggs, Lopez and Koeth, along with four randomly selected bellwether cases (McCarthy, Jacobs, Kelton and Donaldson.)

There is also a separate class action MDL 3037 in Illinois for Abbott’s recalled infant formulas. These cases are unrelated to the NEC formula lawsuits.

Brendan Smith, Esquire. Partner at Simmons Hanly Conroy in the Complex Litigation Department.
Q&A with Brendan Smith Mass Torts and Product Liability Attorney

Award-winning baby formula lawyer Brendan Smith answers important questions about Similac lawsuits.

What’s the most important thing people should know about Similac lawsuits?

Given the complexity of Similac baby formula lawsuits, which involve sophisticated scientific and legal issues, it's vital to engage a law firm experienced in prosecuting complex cases against large companies to ensure your rights are protected.

What are the qualifications for filing a Similac lawsuit?

Should your loved one have ingested Similac baby formula and then sustained an injury followed by a necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) diagnosis, you could be eligible to pursue an NEC lawsuit for financial compensation.

What should people expect after contacting a firm to file a Similac lawsuit?

A dedicated team of lawyers, paralegals, and legal assistants will engage in discussions with you about your experience with Similac, gather pertinent case information, and request and examine medical records. At the appropriate stage, your lawyers will file the Similac lawsuit and work with you to obtain any additional necessary information.

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.