The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates thousands of medical-device manufacturers and a range of products. But the vast majority of new devices only go through a low-scrutiny process before they are cleared for sale to consumers.
Medical devices range from tongue depressors to pacemakers, from stethoscopes to robotic surgical instruments, from bedpans to artificial hearts. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a medical device as “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article” which meets several requirements and is intended for diagnosing, curing, mitigating, treating or preventing medical conditions.
There are currently approximately 175,000 different medical devices on the U.S. market that are overseen by the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), which also regulates more than 18,000 medical device manufacturers and 25,000 medical device facilities worldwide. Every year, the CDRH receives about 22,000 submissions for clearance or approvals of new medical devices.
They include thermometers and syringes, heart monitors and pacemakers, bandages and bedpans. They also include surgical robots and artificial body parts, as well as contraceptive devices and breast implants. Medical devices — even the implantable ones — are a common fact of life in America. More than 2 percent of Americans, or roughly 7 million people, have artificial joints. In 2009, nearly 190,000 pacemakers were implanted in the U.S.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health oversees medical devices marketed in the United States.
Depending on a number of factors, including the potential risk that a device poses to patients, the CDRH has varying levels of scrutiny it applies to new products being introduced. So, for example, a manufacturer that has a new type of bedpan is not required to obtain any clearance from the government before selling it. But the maker of a new heart valve must undergo a lengthy and expensive process, including clinical and laboratory studies and inspection of its manufacturing processes before getting the green light.
The vast majority of new devices introduced in the U.S. are cleared through a lower-level process that has been criticized as incredibly lax and failing to consider whether the devices are safe and effective.
The most rigorous process the CDRH has for scrutinizing new medical devices is called Premarket Approval or PMA. It is designed for devices that pose the highest level of potential risk and includes requirements for clinical trials and laboratory tests. The FDA imposes requirements on the manufacturing process and can request additional data to ensure that the device is safe and effective. In this process, the agency requires information from the manufacturer about everything from shelf life to microbiology and immunology, as well as any adverse reactions and complications discovered in clinical studies.
The CDRH takes an average of 276 days to approve a device through its premarket approval process. This marks a 35 percent reduction in the amount of time it took six years ago.
The vast majority of medical devices introduced onto the U.S. market are cleared through the controversial 510(k) or premarket notification process (PMN).
This process requires only that manufacturers provide information to the CDRH demonstrating that the subject device is “substantially similar” to another device that is legally on the U.S. market. There are no requirements for clinical or laboratory studies to demonstrate that the product is safe or effective.
The 510(k) has been the subject of scathing criticism from national experts, who have called for reform that ensures patient safety and that devices perform as intended. But little has changed, save for efforts to speed up the process to allow new devices to be introduced with greater speed.
In addition to the well-known PMA and 510(k) pathways for medical devices to make it to the U.S. market, the government has established two alternatives for devices under specific conditions.
The CDRH allows some potentially risky devices that can help patients with rare diseases or conditions affecting no more than 8,000 individuals to be introduced without demonstrating some of the effectiveness required in the more stringent PMA. Manufacturers seeking these exemptions have restrictions on their ability to profit from these devices.
Another option is available for less risky devices that are unlike others already on the market. This is called De Novo, and it is described by the FDA as a pathway to classify a low to moderate risk device for which general controls or special controls provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. De Novo is a risk-based and evidence-based classification process.
Medical devices are used in almost every medical procedure. This includes everything from tongue depressors used to check patients’ throats to intrauterine devices that are inserted in women in doctors’ offices.
A recall is a manufacturer’s removal from the market or correction of a marketed product that the FDA considers to be in violation of the law. When a device malfunctions or poses a danger, the FDA may request a recall, or a manufacturer could initiate a recall on its own. The FDA has little inherent power to force recalls, but its requests are usually heeded. In rare cases, if a manufacturer fails to voluntarily recall a device that poses a risk to public health, the FDA may order a recall. If a manufacturer refuses, the FDA may also go to court to seek an order.
Legally, devices subject to recall are considered “adulterated,” which, in FDA parlance, means the device is not meeting its legal performance standard. Under the law, device makers are required, when necessary, to “provide reasonable assurance” of the devices’ “safe and effective performance.”
Among the factors the FDA takes into consideration when requesting a recall are whether use of the product is linked to disease or injuries and how serious of a hazard the product presents.
Many medical devices linked to dangerous side effects and complications have been the subject of recalls.
In addition to issuing formal recalls of troublesome devices, manufacturers can also just stop selling them, or withdraw them from the market without acknowledging any problems. These are more difficult to track because this is done with little fanfare.
If you’ve been injured by a defective medical device, you should consult with a qualified product liability attorney who is experienced in this field of litigation. The attorney can review with you what happened, explain the law, and determine if you should file a lawsuit.
If you and your attorney decide to move forward with a lawsuit, be prepared because the legal process moves slowly and it can take months or years to reach a resolution. The good news is most attorneys charge for their services only if they win a settlement or a jury verdict for the client.
Lawsuits can be filed in state or federal court and generally must be filed in the state where the device manufacturer is based or where the injury took place.
In addition to considering a lawsuit, you should also notify the FDA, either through its online form or by using its mobile app. The FDA keeps track of these adverse events, which impact decisions on issuing recalls and requiring warnings.
Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.
Calling this number connects you with Wilson and Peterson, LLP or one of its trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Wilson and Peterson, LLP funds Drugwatch because it supports the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices.(888) 645-1617