People are filing talcum powder lawsuits over claims that they were diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using talc-based Johnson's Baby Powder. There are currently more than 60,000 cases pending in federal court. Drugwatch can connect you with a trusted legal partner to help you find out if you qualify for a lawsuit.
People are filing talc lawsuits after they developed ovarian cancer after using talc-based products. Most of these cases are consolidated into multidistrict litigation in MDL 2738 before Judge Michael A. Shipp in U.S. District Court in New Jersey. Johnson & Johnson is the main defendant, though some other potentially liable manufacturers, suppliers, distributors and other parties are named in some lawsuits.
According to mass torts and product liability attorney Daniel Nigh, J&J has already attempted to defend their cases using general causation. That is, whether talc can cause ovarian cancer and/or mesothelioma.
“There are other things that cause ovarian cancer. So, that’s the way in which J&J is trying to defend against these cases. They’ve lost multiple trials. And there are some specific cases where there are other clear explanations that are probably stronger explanations for the plaintiff’s ovarian cancer. But for the majority of these lawsuits, that’s not going to be the case,” Nigh told Drugwatch.
“It’s not a strong defense. Multiple literature studies and epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk of ovarian cancer,” Nigh added. “And there is such a clear, plausible, mechanistic explanation of asbestos leading to mesothelioma.”
“There are other things that cause ovarian cancer. So, that's the way in which J&J is trying to defend against these cases. They've lost multiple trials. And there are some specific cases where there are other clear explanations that are probably stronger explanations for the plaintiff’s ovarian cancer. But for the majority of these lawsuits, that's not going to be the case.”
Punitive Damages in Talc Verdicts
In many talcum powder cases, courts issued high-dollar verdicts in favor of those diagnosed with cancer or their families. Punitive damages hold defendants accountable for products they knew contained toxic asbestos that they failed to caution regulators and consumers about.
Internal memos analyzed by Reuters and available to plaintiffs’ lawyers show that J&J researched and uncovered asbestos contamination in its talc products.
Kimm Massey, EsquirePersonal Injury and Civil Litigation Attorney
Kimm Massey, Esq., is a Harvard-educated attorney with over 30 years of litigation experience, specializing in injury cases.
What are punitive damages, and who can claim them in a talc lawsuit?
Punitive damages are awarded on top of compensatory damages to provide extra punishment for the defendant and to deter similar harmful acts by other defendants. Plaintiffs who can prove that J&J acted maliciously in marketing and selling talc, or in wanton and willful disregards of their rights, can seek punitive damages.
Who Qualifies for the Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
You may be eligible to file a talc lawsuit if you developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after regularly using or working with talc-based products. You may also be eligible to file a talc claim if you lost a loved one to cancer after asbestos exposure.
To make a strong case and maximize potential compensation, plaintiffs should hire an attorney. It takes legal expertise and relevant case experience to document asbestos exposure or ovarian cancer from talc products.
Your eligibility to file a talc lawsuit also depends on your state’s statute of limitations. The average statute of limitations for a wrongful death talc lawsuit is about two years from the cancer patient’s date of death. It usually takes 20 to 60 years from the time of asbestos exposure to develop detectable cancer symptoms.
Drugwatch partners with trusted law firms to help you take legal action. After submitting the form, one of Drugwatch's partners will contact you for a free case review.
What's the Latest on the Talc Lawsuits?
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) faced 63,393 pending talcum powder lawsuits in multidistrict litigation in New Jersey as of July 2025. MDL 2738 is before Judge Michael A. Shipp in U.S. District Court.
In 2024, J&J had a newly formed subsidiary file for bankruptcy as part of an effort to complete an $8 billion settlement to resolve thousands of talc lawsuits. But that settlement made use of a controversial procedure called a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy and it was rejected by a judge in early 2025.
J&J is not currently pursuing a mass settlement for these cases, but the MDL is progressing toward holding a bellwether trial. These trials are used when hundreds or thousands of similar lawsuits are filed. They work as test cases, helping both sides understand the strength of their case. Wins for plaintiffs in bellwether trials can convince defendants to negotiate a settlement instead of risking taking more cases to trial.
Talcum Powder Lawsuits Timeline
June 2025
The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the talc MDL have selected the lawsuit that they would like to serve as the first bellwether trial. Bellwethers are a key part of the MDL process. They essentially act like test cases, with the outcome of the trial giving both sides a better idea of the strength of their arguments and which way the litigation is trending. If defendants lose the bellwether trials, they sometimes decide to agree to a settlement for all cases instead of risking taking more to trial.
April 2025
In the wake of the talc bankruptcy rejection, work in the MDL is once again underway. A status conference has been scheduled for June 17 as some of the outstanding issues in the MDL return to the spotlight, including the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
March 2025
Judge Christopher Lopez has rejected Red River Talc's bankruptcy plan, bringing an end to Johnson & Johnson's proposed multibillion-dollar talcum powder settlement. J&J says that it does not plan to appeal the decision and instead will focus on combating the existing litigation.
February 2025
Red River Talc's bankruptcy hearing is now underway. This hearing is key to the future of J&J's $8 billion ovarian cancer settlement. In order for the settlement to be completed, Red River Talc's bankruptcy will need to be approved. The hearing began on Feb. 18 and is set to last more than a week.
January 2025
As the bankruptcy hearing key to J&J’s settlement plans nears, multiple objections have been filed. The U.S. Trustee, Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Health and Human Services have all objected to the bankruptcy, with the two departments stating that the settlement would disrupt their right to reimbursement of health care costs they have incurred in relation these claims.
The U.S. Trustee, which has fought against the settlement plan since it was introduced, continues to claim that the case was filed in bad faith. J&J is attempting the controversial Texas two-step bankruptcy strategy, where a subsidiary takes on liabilities and files for bankruptcy in place of the main company. The bankruptcy hearing remains set for Feb. 18.
In other talc lawsuit news, a jury this month attempted to award $22 million to a plaintiff in a mesothelioma trial despite delivering a winning verdict to J&J. Jurors were not meant to fill out information on damages awarded to the plaintiff since the defendants had won the trial.
December 2024
The pause on talc ovarian cancer litigation will remain in place into March as Red River Talc’s bankruptcy proceedings continue. Talc lawsuits have been stayed since September as J&J has worked to complete its $8 billion settlement to resolve thousands of ovarian cancer lawsuits. The bankruptcy trial is set for Feb. 18.
November 2024
An Oregon judge has upheld a $260 million verdict in a J&J baby powder trial from June. Kyung Lee had been awarded the verdict after she developed mesothelioma at 49 years old following lifelong use of J&J’s talc-based powder.
October 2024
The DOJ's bankruptcy watchdog has filed a new motion to dismiss Red River Talc's bankruptcy case, citing its similarities to J&J's past settlement attempts. The judge overseeing the bankruptcy case said that a trial will likely be held in January or February over the motions to dismiss along with claims questioning plaintiff support for the settlement.
But in a big win for J&J's talc settlement hopes earlier this month, Judge Lopez allowed the bankruptcy case to remain in Texas. There had been pressure for the case to be moved to the New Jersey court where the company's past settlement attempts had failed. This is a key step toward completion of the $8 billon settlement.
September 2024
J&J’s subsidiary Red River Talc has filed for bankruptcy in Texas court. This is a necessary step to complete the company’s talc settlement proposal, which is believed to be worth about $8 billion. Shortly after the case was filed, Judge Christopher Lopez ordered an automatic stay on talc litigation.
J&J had tacked another $1.1 billion onto its proposal in early September. According to Reuters, the company also gained the support of a plaintiffs’ lawyer representing thousands of clients, which helped secure the 75% threshold of plaintiff support that J&J needed to move forward.
An Oregon state judge has overturned a win for plaintiff Kyung Lee from June. J&J had been ordered to pay Lee $260 million after she blamed her mesothelioma on decades-long use of the company’s baby powder.
August 2024:
On Aug. 15, a South Carolina state court jury ordered J&J and co-defendant American International Industries to pay $63.4 million in damages to Michael Perry, who blamed his mesothelioma on J&J’s baby powder. Perry had used the powder daily due to a deodorant allergy before he was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2023.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied J&J's third attempt at bankruptcy. Bloomberg reported that sources told the news outlet that J&J had met the 75% plaintiff voting threshold to get the $6.5 billion settlement approved through bankruptcy. The settlement still hasn't received court approval.
July 2024:
July has been a very busy month for talc-related lawsuit updates. A federal judge allowed J&J's $6.48 billion, 25-year lawsuit settlement plan to proceed despite plaintiffs' objections. The plan aims to settle thousands of talcum powder cancer lawsuits through a subsidiary's bankruptcy. Critics point out that two previous attempts to settle through bankruptcy failed, and the offer denies plaintiffs fair compensation.
Also this month, a judge dismissed J&J's subsidiary LTL Management's lawsuits against Dr. Jacqueline Moline, a scientist who wrote an influential paper on the link between asbestos contaminated talc and cancer. J&J accused Moline of fraud and libel, among other things, but the judge found the lawsuit presented no evidence to prove its case.
At the beginning of July, The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer re-classified talc from a "possible carcinogen" to a "probable carcinogen," the second highest level for certainty that a substance causes cancer. Scientists reached their decision in part from limited evidence that talc increases risk of ovarian cancer.
Johnson & Johnson proposed a $505 million settlement with bankrupt talc miners Imerys Talc America and Cyprus Mines Corporation. in mid-July, the settlement addresses long-standing disputes and indemnification agreements related to talc liabilities as Imerys and Cyprus have historically been co-defendants in lawsuits against J&J for its talc-based products.
June 2024:
A class action lawsuit filed on June 17 in New Jersey called for J&J to pay for medical monitoring for talc-related cancer. The lawsuit would provide cancer monitoring for women who've used J&J talc products, but have not filed a cancer lawsuit. It could cost billions of dollars and affect tens of thousands of women.
June 2024:
J&J officially reached an agreement with 42 states and the District of Columbia to settle deceptive talc marketing claims for $700 million. Each state in the settlement will receive between $3 million and $78 million. The agreement would not affect individual lawsuits in the ongoing MDL.
June 2024:
On June 4, An Oregon jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay Kyung Lee $260 million. Lee, a 48-year-old woman, claimed that her mesothelioma was caused by her lifelong use of the company's baby powder tainted with asbestos.
May 2024:
A new NIH study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology linked talcum powder use to ovarian cancer, potentially bolstering lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson. Experts said the findings could bolster plaintiffs’ claims, affecting the proposed $6.48 billion settlement and altering the course of litigation.
May 2024:
J&J offered ovarian cancer plaintiffs a $6.48 billion settlement over 25 years, facilitated through the bankruptcy of subsidiary LTL Management. This third attempt at a settlement would require three-quarters of the plaintiffs claiming ovarian cancer injuries to agree to the offer within 90 days.
April 2024:
An Illinois trial ended in victory for the family of Theresa Garcia, a woman who died of mesothelioma allegedly linked to her use of J&J's talcum-based baby powder. The jury ordered J&J and its Kenvue division to pay the family $45 million in damages.
April 2024:
A Sarasota, Florida, jury ruled that Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder was not the cause of Pat Matthey's cancer death in 2019. In 2016, doctors diagnosed her with ovarian cancer, and her son filed a wrongful death lawsuit against J&J on behalf of his mother's estate.
March 2024:
A Florida trial involving plaintiff Bob Sugarman who sued J&J on behalf of his deceased wife Marilyn Seskin ended in a mistrial on March 5 when the jury was unable to reach an agreement. Seskin was diagnosed with a rare form of ovarian cancer allegedly caused by Johnson's Baby Powder, according to the plaintiff.
February 2024:
The judge in the talcum powder MDL set various deadlines for depositions and Daubert motions through September 2024. Attorneys think the next trial will be at the end of 2024 at the earliest.
January 2024:
J&J tentatively agreed to a $700 million settlement with over 40 U.S. states regarding its talcum powder marketing. While the settlement doesn't directly affect individual talcum powder lawsuits, it could avert future case filings claiming that the company knew of a link between its talc powder products and cancer.
December 2023:
Several bellwether trials were scheduled in 2024 and 2025. J&J's LTL Management subsidiary was denied bankruptcy proceedings twice and expected to file a third time to push its $9 billion settlement through. In the meantime, cases had been quietly settling for confidential amounts.
April 2023:
According to a regulatory filing, LTL Management refiled for bankruptcy protection in a New Jersey court. Under a proposed agreement, J&J would pay about $8.9 billion over 25 years to current and future plaintiffs to settle talcum powder lawsuits.
April 2023:
In a New Jersey bankruptcy court, Judge Michael Kaplan nullified the LTL Management bankruptcy he had previously affirmed.
March 2023:
The U.S. Court of Appeals declined LTL Management’s request to stay a bankruptcy ruling while the company sought a U.S. Supreme Court review.
January 2023:
In Philadelphia, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed LTL Management’s bankruptcy status. The ruling temporarily prevented J&J from exploiting bankruptcy law to resolve the multibillion-dollar talc powder lawsuits it faces.
September 2022:
Plaintiffs' attorneys in J&J talc baby powder lawsuits presented their arguments against LTL Management’s bankruptcy in court.
October 2021:
J&J created the subsidiary LTL Management, which assumed the company’s then-$4.5 billion potential liabilities from talcum powder lawsuits. LTL Management filed for “Texas two-step bankruptcy” soon after.
June 2021:
In a landmark ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court declined J&J’s request to overturn a $2.1 billion Missouri court award to 22 women with ovarian cancer.
In 2019, Johnson & Johnson issued a recall of 33,000 bottles of Johnson’s Baby Powder after testing found asbestos in samples. While J&J continues to deny any liability and insists it did not sell cancer-causing products, it halted the sale of talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in North America in May 2020. In 2023, it switched to a cornstarch-based alternative and discontinued worldwide sales of its talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder.
Did Johnson & Johnson Settle the Talcum Powder Lawsuit?
Johnson & Johnson has tried several times to resolve the talcum powder litigation through a settlement, but has not had success.
The company formed a subsidiary called LTL Management that filed for bankruptcy as part of an effort to complete a settlement via a Texas Two-Step maneuver in 2021, but that case was dismissed. J&J had LTL Management file for Chapter 11 a second time, but that attempt also failed.
On May 1, 2024, J&J proposed a $6.48 billion settlement for lawsuits claiming its talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer that would be paid out over 25 years and be funded through a subsidiary. To move forward, 75% of plaintiffs needed to vote to accept it within 90 days. Settlement experts with sources close to the litigation suggested that the required number of plaintiffs agreed to the proposed settlement in a secret ballot that ended in July.
J&J added an additional $1.1 billion to the settlement plan in early September, with the strategy remaining to pay out that money over 25 years. Reuters also reported that the company reached an agreement with a plaintiffs’ lawyer representing 12,000 clients to recommend the settlement plan, likely removing any doubt from the question of whether J&J had reached the 75% plaintiff threshold.
A new subsidiary called Red River Talc filed for bankruptcy to complete this settlement in September, but that attempt was then shot down by a judge in March.
It’s important to keep in mind that these are just estimates, and many factors play a role in determining a settlement payout amount. The exact value will depend on your individual case.
Choosing a Talcum Powder Lawyer
Before choosing a law firm to represent you, consider their experience in personal injury litigation against major corporations. Working with top talcum powder lawyers is essential because defendants will deny liability and often have adequate resources to contest all claims, no matter how long it takes.
Ask whether they have nationwide resources and ask them the value of talc lawsuit settlements and verdicts they’ve secured for clients over the years. If you’re in the hospital or too sick to travel, you may need a lawyer with virtual consultation options and the flexibility to come to you.
Top talcum powder law firms to consider include Drugwatch’s legal partner, Simmons Hanly Conroy. The firm has secured millions in settlements and verdicts for its clients and has many years of experience litigating product liability claims, including those against Johnson & Johnson and other pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers.
We appreciate your feedback. One of our content team members will be in touch with you soon.
We appreciate your feedback. One of our content team members will be in touch with you soon.
Who Am I Calling?
Calling this number connects you with a Drugwatch.com representative. We will direct you to one of our trusted legal partners for a free case review.
Drugwatch.com's trusted legal partners support the organization's mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.
“There are other things that cause ovarian cancer. So, that's the way in which J&J is trying to defend against these cases. They've lost multiple trials. And there are some specific cases where there are other clear explanations that are probably stronger explanations for the plaintiff’s ovarian cancer. But for the majority of these lawsuits, that's not going to be the case.”
