ALERT: Your health is top priority. We’re committed to providing reliable COVID-19 resources to keep you informed and safe.

Depakote Lawsuits

Hundreds of people sued AbbVie claiming pregnant women who took Depakote gave birth to children with defects. There have been a few trials with some ending in favor of Abbvie. Others ended in multimillion-dollar verdicts for plaintiffs. In 2018, the court put cases on hold to allow for settlement negotiations.

As of early 2018, AbbVie faced 635 pending Depakote lawsuits, according to the company’s corporate filings. More than 90 percent of the claims were pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

Families began filing the first Depakote birth defect lawsuits in state court in 2010. This was nearly 30 years after the drug — which is used to treat seizures and bipolar disorder — went on the market.

Several lawsuits were moved to federal court on Jan. 18, 2012. By Sept. 20, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois had 129 cases pending on its docket.

Litigation says the drug caused serious birth defects in children whose mothers took it while pregnant. Women suing Abbott and its successor AbbVie say had the companies adequately warned them of the risk, they would not have taken the drug while pregnant.

As of early 2018, AbbVie faced 619 pending Depakote lawsuits, according to the company’s corporate filings. More than 90 percent of the claims were pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In June of 2018, all cases were put on hold to allow the parties to focus on settlement negotiations.

Families began filing the first Depakote birth defect lawsuits in state court in 2010. This was nearly 30 years after the drug went on the market.

Lawsuits: Drugmaker Didn't Warn Women

Lawsuits seek compensation for injuries suffered by children whose mothers took the drug when they were pregnant. These injuries include birth defects of the spine, heart and head, and other developmental disorders.

Lawsuits allege that defendants should have known about the risk as far back as 1980 — when researchers released one of the first reports connecting Depakote to birth defects.

By 1983, medical literature had documented a 20-fold increase in spina bifida among infants whose mothers had used the drug during pregnancy, according to a complaint and jury demand. Yet, Abbott failed to inform doctors and patients of the risk. Plaintiffs claim the drug increases the risk of fetal malformation compared to other anti-seizure medications.

Some birth defects mentioned in lawsuits include:
  • Spina bifida
  • Physical malformations such as cleft palate or clubbed foot
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Cardiac defects
  • Skeletal abnormalities

Court Pauses Current Cases for Settlement Negotiations

In January 2018, plaintiffs in more than 250 cases joined the defendants to ask the court to put their cases on hold to allow complex settlement negotiations. U.S. Chief District Judge Michael J. Reagan granted the motion.

Reagan issued an administrative order on June 7, 2018, that terminated all pending motions, and he transferred more than 100 cases to U.S. District Judge David R. Herndon for “purposes of settlement administration.”

Another judge involved in the Illinois cases, U.S. District Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel, also focused attorneys on efforts to settle. In April 2018, she put remaining cases on hold to “enable the Court to conduct an aggressive, timely settlement campaign.”

Past Lawsuit over Spina Bifida, Disfigurements Ends in Settlement

In June 2016, Abbott settled a lawsuit before a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri handed up a verdict. Terms of the settlement with Thomas and Beth Forbes on behalf of their son were not disclosed. The child was born with disfigurements and spina bifida after mother Beth Forbes got pregnant while taking Depakote for depression in April 2003, records show.

Juries Reach Mixed Verdicts

Multiple cases have gone to trial, and results have been mixed. Initially, the court tried cases one plaintiff at a time. However, Judge Rosenstengel in Illinois determined that approach and efforts for reaching a global settlement had failed.

The judge decided to combine similar cases and hold joint trials. “Given the number of litigants in this case, trying cases one plaintiff at a time is not a feasible option,” she said in a Sept. 20, 2016, memorandum and order.

Timeline of Key Verdicts
  • March 2015
    The first case to go to trial was in March 2015. It lasted for about 15 court days before the jury reached a verdict in favor of Abbott. During the trial, Mary and Daniel Kaleta sought $30 million for their son Danny, who was born with spina bifida. Abbott didn’t deny Depakote caused the son’s injuries, but argued the mother understood the risks.
  • May 2015
    The first verdict against Abbott was for $38 million and came in May 2015. A St. Louis state-court jury ordered Abbott to pay $15 million in compensatory damages and $23 million in punitive damages to Maddison Schmidt, a girl whose adoptive family alleged her spina bifida was tied to her birth mother’s use of Depakote to treat epilepsy during pregnancy. The Missouri Supreme Court upheld that verdict in 2017.
  • November 2015
    An Ohio jury reached a verdict in favor of Abbott in a November 2015 trial. Pamela Rheinfrank’s daughter Maria was born in 2003 with microcephaly and other disorders. Rheinfrank had been taking the drug to treat her epilepsy. The jury decided that the Rheinfrank didn’t prove that Abbott failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks of taking the drug while pregnant.
  • February 2017
    An Ohio federal jury ruled for Abbott in February 2017. Kevin and Christin Hutchens alleged their son was born in 2003 with microcephaly as a result of the mother taking Depakote while pregnant. Christin Hutchens was taking the drug for epilepsy in 2002 when she conceived her son. Abbott argued the drug’s label explicitly warned of the birth defect risk. The jury found the couple didn’t prove Abbott failed to adequately warn of the drug’s risks. The jury also said they failed to prove the drug was defective or that the company committed fraud.
  • June 2017
    Federal jurors in Illinois awarded $15 million to Christina Raquel in June 2017. Raquel blamed her use of the drug for her son’s birth defects. The serious injuries required the boy to have 12 surgeries. He uses a wheelchair.

Abbott Pleads Guilty to Off-Label Promotion, Pays $1.5 Billion

Abbott paid $1.5 billion to the federal government and 24 states for promoting Depakote for off-label use. This was the second largest settlement paid by a drug company at the time.

Guilty Plea
In 2012, Abbott pleaded guilty to a federal charge of misbranding Depakote.

The U.S. Department of Justice accused the company of maintaining a specialized sales force between 1998 and 2006 to market the drug for uses not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The unapproved uses included schizophrenia, depression and anxiety.

During a four-year investigation, federal officials found that Abbott violated FDA regulations and state and federal laws. The company illegally promoted the drug to control agitation and aggression in elderly dementia patients.

It created programs and materials about off-label use of Depakote to train pharmacists at long-term-care pharmacies that serviced nursing homes, and it paid millions of dollars in rebates based on increased use of the drug.

depakote 250 mg tablet
Depakote Lawsuit Facts
  1. Injuries Birth defects, spina bifida, heart defects, craniofacial defects, neural tube defects, cognitive impairment
  2. Defendants Abbott Laboratories Inc., AbbVie Inc.
  3. Top Verdict $38 million

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.

Related Pages
Michelle Llamas, Senior Content Writer
Written By Michelle Llamas Senior Writer

Michelle Llamas has been writing articles and producing podcasts about drugs, medical devices and the FDA for nearly a decade. She focuses on various medical conditions, health policy, COVID-19, LGBTQ health, mental health and women’s health issues. Michelle collaborates with experts, including board-certified doctors, patients and advocates, to provide trusted health information to the public. Some of her qualifications include:

  • Member of American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) and former Engage Committee and Membership Committee member
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health Literacy certificates
  • Original works published or cited in The Lancet, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and the Journal for Palliative Medicine
Edited By
Emily Miller
Emily Miller Managing Editor

15 Cited Research Articles writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.

  1. Alexander et al. v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. (2016, September 20). United States District Court Southern District of Illinois. Case No. 12-CV-52-NJR-SCW. Memorandum and Order. Retrieved from
  2. Grzincic, B. (2018, April 24). Federal judge puts remaining Depakote cases on hold. Reuters. Retrieved from
  3. Gillespie v. Abbott. (2017, October 3). United States District Court Southern District of Illinois, Complaint and Jury Demand, Case No. 3:17-cv-1063. Retrieved from
  4. AbbVie. (2018). Quarterly Report filed with United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Form 110-Q). Retrieved from
  5. Lexis Legal News. (2017, September 14). Missouri Supreme Court: $38M Depakote Birth Defect Verdict Came From ‘Fair Trial.’ Retrieved from
  6. Bellon, T. (2018, January 22). Federal judge pauses more than 250 Depakote cases pending settlement talks. Retrieved from
  7. In Re Depakote. (2018, January 19). United States District court for the Southern District of Illinois. Case No. 3:13-cv-52. Joint Motion for Entry of Administrative Order. Document 1174. Retrieved from
  8. U.S. Department of Justice. (2012, May 7). Abbott Labs to Pay $1.5 Billion to Resolve Criminal & Civil investigations of Off-Label Promotions of Depakote. Retrieved from
  9. In Re Depakote. (2018, February 3). United States District court for the Southern District of Illinois. Case No. 3:13-cv-52. Transcript of Status Conference. Document 1180. Retrieved from
  10. In Re Depakote. (2018, June 7). United States District court for the Southern District of Illinois. Case No. 3:13-cv-52. Administrative Order. Document 1199. Retrieved from
  11. Lexis Legal News. (2017, February 3). Defense Verdict Returned By Ohio Federal Jury In Depakote Birth Defect Trial. Retrieved from
  12. Lexis Legal News. (2015, November 3). Ohio Federal Jury Returns Defense Verdict In Depakote Birth Defect Trial. Retrieved from
  13. Madison – St. Clair Record. (2015, April 9). Abbott Labs cleared in Depakote bellwether trial; Plaintiff sought $30 million over child's birth defects. Retrieved from
  14. Feeley, J. and Bross, T. (2015, May 28). Jury: Abbott Must Pay $23M in Punitive Damages Over Depakote. Insurance Journal. Retrieved from
  15. Casetext. (2016, September 20). Lead Consolidated Case. Retrieved from
View All Sources
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with a Drugwatch representative. We will direct you to one of our trusted legal partners for a free case review.

Drugwatch's trusted legal partners support the organization's mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.

(888) 645-1617