The Bair Hugger Normothermia System is a surgical blanket that uses forced-air warming (FAW) to keep patients’ body temperature normal during surgery. Body temperatures can drop dangerously low during surgery and the devices play an important role in operating rooms. But studies show the devices may allow bacteria to float on air currents and end up inside patients’ bodies.
If you or a loved one suffered complications or injury after surgery with a Bair Hugger warming device, you may have legal options.
More than 4,300 patients have sued 3M, the manufacturer of Bair Hugger, saying the device was responsible for infections they experienced from surgery. Many of these were for surgeries involving implants, including knee, hip and other joint replacements, which have a higher risk for contamination than other surgeries.
Bacterial-joint infection can cause septic arthritis, which in turn can cause sudden pain and swelling and can destroy a joint if not treated promptly with antibiotics.
While some infections are easily treated, others are not. Patients can and have developed serious deep-joint infections following surgery, including something called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This bacterial infection can cause hard-to-treat and potentially life-threatening problems in a patient’s bloodstream, lungs and other organs.
MRSA is a strain of common bacteria that has grown resistant to antibiotics. Drug-resistant bacteria are sometimes called “superbugs” because they are so hard to treat with routine medicines.
Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacteria that usually goes unnoticed. About 2 in 10 people always carry it in their body. Another 6 in 10 people will carry it in their bodies from time to time. Healthy people have a small risk of infection from the bacteria, but that risk increases if a person carrying the bacteria has surgery.
MRSA is much more serious because it cannot be easily treated with antibiotics.
Doctors may be able to drain the infection without the use of drugs if it is caught early enough. While MRSA is resistant to most antibiotics, there may be some drugs that can still be effective. But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends doctors first use lab tests to find out exactly what strain of MSRA the patient has. This allows doctors to select the most effective antibiotic to treat it.
Complications from MRSA infections can be life-threatening and may overcome patients quickly. The only way to know if MRSA is responsible for an infection is through laboratory tests. It is important for people who think they may be infected to talk with their doctor as soon as possible.
MRSA can cause difficult-to-treat and sometimes fatal conditions, including sepsis, pneumonia and skin infections that can spread deep into the body.
Sepsis is a medical emergency requiring immediate medical attention. It is the body’s own, life-threatening response to an infection. Sepsis can cause tissue damage, organ failure and even death. The CDC lists Staphylococcus aureus as one of the most frequently identified forms of bacteria responsible for sepsis.
Several different kinds of bacteria, viruses and fungi can cause pneumonia, but cases caused by MRSA can advance quickly and be deadly. It can be extremely hard to treat MRSA pneumonia, and more than 7 in 10 people who develop it die. The risk of severe cases of pneumonia may even remain if doctors are able to stop the MRSA infection.
Not all pneumonia is due to MRSA, but people who have had surgery or been hospitalized should pay close attention to possible bacterial pneumonia symptoms.
MRSA skin infections can painful. They can quickly lead to deep abscesses requiring surgery to drain. Left untreated, they can spread from the skin to bones, joints and into the bloodstream.
Once in the blood, MRSA infections can spread to the lungs and heart, where it can disrupt heart valves.
Patients or caretakers who think an infection may be due to MRSA should cover it with a bandage, wash their hands thoroughly with soap and water and call their doctor.
Researchers have found forced-air warming (FAW) blankets may stir up small particles in operating rooms and cause them to float around patients in surgery. Studies have shown Bair Hugger devices can disrupt air flow in an operating room. Changes in air currents can lift bacteria and other contaminates up from near-floor level and carry them to the air around a patient’s incision. This could increase their chances of ending up in the patient’s body.
Beginning in 2011, multiple studies have found forced-air warming could increase the risk of infection during high-risk orthopedic surgeries. However, some researchers say these studies have flaws that make them inconclusive, unreliable and unable to prove that FAW increases infection risk. And Bair Hugger maker 3M maintains that the systems are safe and effective in all surgeries, including orthopedic surgeries.
A 2011 study published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery simulated hip replacement and lumbar spinal procedures using both forced-air warming and conductive fabric warming, with a mannequin as a patient. In 2011, researchers compared forced-air warming, used in the Bair Hugger device, to an alternative-warming device that did not use forced air. They simulated a hip-replacement surgery and found the forced-air device generated air currents that “mobilized floor air into the surgical site area.”
“Air-free warming is, therefore, recommended over forced-air warming for orthopedic procedures,” the researchers concluded.
Researchers in 2012 conducted a similar study, as reported in the journal Anesthesia & Analgesia. They released neutrally buoyant detergent bubbles in a simulated surgery and tracked whether the bubbles moved to the simulated incision. When forced-air warming was used, they found “a significant mean increase” in number of particles over the surgical site. They found forced-air warming sent more than 275 times as many bubbles over the simulated incision.
Another 2012 study in the UK journal Anaesthesia found similar results, but cautioned that the simulations were not perfect. Researchers pointed out that it was difficult to recreate the airflow generated or affected by multiple health care professionals working in an operating room. They also said that airflow should be one of several factors taken into account in determining what type of heating device to choose for a procedure. Waste heat created convection currents that created turbulence over the patient that could draw damaging particles from below the operating table to the surgical site.
A 2013 study published in The Bone & Joint Journal found that waste heat from forced-air warming blankets such as the Bair Hugger, “can increase the temperature and concentration of airborne particles” around patients in operating rooms, increasing the chance of infection. Researchers in the study also simulated knee-replacement surgeries. They compared simulations using a forced-air warming blanket, to those using a warming device that did not use forced-air. They found air ‘turbulence over the patient” stirring with 2 million airborne particles per cubic meter in the forced-air simulation. That compared to just 1,000 particles from alternative warming methods.
In January 2018, 3M recalled more than 165,000 Bair Hugger underbody blankets. The recall notice blamed a design change for preventing some devices from fully inflating.
“If blankets are only partially inflated during use in surgery, the potential exists for incomplete warming therapy to be given to a patient,” 3M said in a Field Safety Notice.
The FDA received a report shortly before the recall. It said one of the blankets failed to fully inflate during surgery. A patient suffered hypothermia. Doctors moved the patient to the intensive care unit until the patient’s body temperature returned to normal.
Minnesota-based 3M purchased the company that makes Bair Hugger in 2010 for $810 million and has defended its product against claims that the devices can increase infection risks.
Augustine now manufactures a competing device, the Hot Dog, which does not use forced-air warming. He claims his new product is safer than the Bair Hugger he invented in 1987.
In response to Augustine’s claims, multiple studies and increasing numbers of lawsuits, 3M launched a campaign to prove Bair Huggers were safe. 3M said Augustine’s claims are alarmist and based on faulty studies and offers as evidence the results of more than 170 studies and more than 60 randomized clinical trials that show the system’s benefits, efficacy and safety.
In 2016, 3M published a pamphlet entitled Let’s spread good science in which it maintained that an independent review of literature about FAW systems by ECRI Institute, an independent organization, found “insufficient evidence to establish that the use of FAW systems leads to an increase in SSIs (surgical site infections) compared to other warming methods,” and claimed that studies to the contrary used flawed methodologies.
“There is no evidence that forced-air warming increases the risk of infection,” 3M attorney Christiana Jacxsens told Outpatient Surgery Magazine in 2015. “In its entire history, not one hospital, doctor or medical provider has reported a single confirmed incidence of infection believed to be caused by the Bair Hugger device.”
Dr. Javad Parvizi, professor of orthopedic surgery at Thomas Jefferson University’s Rothman Institute, analyzed the evidence presented that FAW increased infections. He said, “There is no scientific proof that the use of forced-air warming blankets leads to an increase in surgical site infection regardless of the type of surgical procedure and the type of operating room.”
Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.
Calling this number connects you with Wilson and Peterson, LLP or one of its trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Wilson and Peterson, LLP funds Drugwatch because it supports the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices.(855) 617-2058