The inventor of Bair Hugger warming blankets, also called forced air warming blankets (FAW), is warning of the risk for infections the device could cause when used during orthopedic surgeries.
Dr. Scott D. Augustine invented the Bair Hugger warming blanket and introduced it in 1988. The blankets were a success, but now he is claiming the blankets have an increased risk of spreading infection during surgery.
“I am very proud of the old technology,” Augustine told the New York Times. “But I am also proud to spread the word that there is a problem.”
Doctors use the warming blankets in millions of surgeries every year to prevent hypothermia – a condition where the body loses heat quicker than it can produce it.
Augustine marketed warming blankets through his company Augustine Medical which later changed its name to Arizant. Augustine resigned from his positions as chairman of the board and chief executive of Arizant in 2002, and 3M purchased Arizant in 2010.
In a statement, 3M responded to Augustine’s claims: “We believe Mr. Augustine’s allegations against forced-air warming (FAW) stem from a personal vendetta and are baseless,” according to the Times.
To back his claim, Augustine cites multiple studies in his 2013 safety analysis, “Forced-Air Warming in Orthopedic Surgery: Benefit Or Danger?”
While the study authors did not find a definitive link between FAW and increased infection, Augustine nonetheless asserts the Bair Hugger blankets are not as safe as previously claimed. He was also critical of safety studies performed by 3M.
“Given that all of the studies cited by 3M are either irrelevant or poorly designed, it is impossible for FAW to claim safety in orthopedic implant surgery,” Augustine wrote in his 2013 safety analysis. “Although there is only one study positively linking FAW to infection, five studies clearly prove increased airborne contamination of the sterile surgical field when FAW is used.”
Not all researchers are so quick to condemn FAW. A report published in 2013 by ECRI Institute, formerly Emergency Care Research Institute, called “Forced-Air Warming and Surgical Site Infections: Our Review Finds Insufficient Evidence to Support Changes in Current Practice” examines much of the research highlighted in Augustine’s article.
“Demonstrating that airflow patterns change when FAW is used does not establish that it results in increased bacterial contamination or increased rates of SSI (surgical site infection) and PJI (prosthetic joint infection) as compared to use of other methods of patient warming,” report authors stated.
While the organization found over 180 studies, the data did not meet the criteria to be included in the review. It found four studies which came close. It found no evidence that conclusively established a link between increased infections and FAW. Ultimately, ECRI said that currently available evidence does not justify “discontinuing the use of FAW during surgery.”
With at least 15 lawsuits against 3M and Arizant pending in five different federal courts, attorneys have requested cases be consolidated to a single multidistrict litigation court in Minnesota, according to Reuters.
In a recent filing in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Manuel Griego claims a Bair Hugger warming blanket used during a knee replacement surgery in 2014 caused him to develop a serious infection.
The Bair Hugger device interfered with air flow in the operating room, causing bacteria and contaminants to spread to the surgical site. Griego had to undergo five additional surgeries including having his implant removed and replaced, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit against 3M and Arizant claims the manufacturers were negligent in manufacturing, designing and promoting Bair Huggers. Griego is seeking compensation for past and future damages including lost earnings, medical expenses, and pain and suffering.
Despite Augustine’s repeated warnings and increased scrutiny created by multiple lawsuits, Bair Hugger warming blankets are still used in hospitals for orthopedic surgeries across the U.S.
Drugwatch.com writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.
Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Drugwatch's trusted legal partners support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.(888) 645-1617