(888) 645-1617

Knee Replacement

Knee replacement can help relieve pain from joint trauma or degenerative disease like osteoarthritis. More than 600,000 people in the U.S. undergo a partial or total knee operation each year, and that number is expected to grow to 3.48 million by 2030.

*Please seek the advice of a medical professional before discontinuing the use of this medical device.

Metal-on-metal Knee Replacement

Knee replacements are surgical substitutions of a knee joint where the femur and tibia bone meet, with an artificial joint or implant. Although the procedure might seem like a modern one, it actually dates back to the mid-1800s.

Medical device companies refined all manner of artificial joints over the past three decades as doctors discovered more demand for them. An increased number of younger (and more active) potential recipients are wearing down or injuring their joints and asking for permanent or semi-permanent medical solutions.

Hereditary Knee Replacement Conditions:

  • Arthritis
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Developmental abnormalities

Acute Knee Replacement Conditions:

  • Avascular necrosis (bone death)
  • Obesity
  • Emergency traumas
  • Repeated injuries

Doctors recommend knee replacement surgery when patients endure constant pain or when daily life is affected by poor mobility. More than 90 percent of knee replacement patients experience a significant reduction in knee pain, according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Recipients can have a partial knee replacement or a total knee replacement. The difference depends on the recipient’s condition and pain level.

Elderly man experiencing knee pain
Knee replacement surgery may be necessary when daily life is affected by poor mobility

Rising Number of Knee Replacement Surgeries

When medications, therapies and other treatments don’t work, surgery is the next step to reclaiming mobility. A total knee replacement can get a patient back to work or back to a better quality of life.

The amount of knee replacement surgeries continue to grow in the U.S. and are projected to near 3.5 million procedures each year by 2030. This significant increase, in large part, can be attributed to the growing number of baby boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964) reaching retirement age — when the chance of a worn-out joint is higher — and a rise in obesity and an increased need for follow-up procedures (revision surgery).

Most patients who undergo total knee replacement are between 50 and 80, but recommendations for these procedures are based on a patient’s pain and disability, not age.

How Do Artificial Knee Joints Work?

The knee joint forms where the femur (thighbone) meets the tibia (shinbone) and fibula (runs alongside the tibia). The patella (kneecap), located on the front of the knee, moves up and down against the femur. These bones are connected by ligaments, muscles and cartilage that help form the joint hinge and give the joint its flexibility.

Although there are four bones around the knee joint, only the femur, tibia and patella are affected by an implant.

While many device companies design and manufacture knee implants, which in turn can be made from a variety of metals, plastics and ceramics, artificial knee joints consist of three components.

The three components of a knee implant include:

  • Femoral component: This metal piece attaches to the end of the femur. It has a groove that allows the patellar component to slide up and down smoothly as the knee bends and straightens.
  • Tibial component: This flat, two-piece metal and polyethylene (plastic) part is attached to the tibia. The metal part sits on top of the tibia and has a stem that is inserted into the tibia for stability. The plastic part, or tibial spacer, acts as a cushion between the metal tibial component and the metal femoral component.
  • Patellar component: This plastic piece is dome-shaped to match the resurfaced shape of the patella. Because the patella rests against the femur, the alignment of the patellar component and femoral component is crucial for proper function. The patella is held in place by the quadriceps tendon and patellar tendon.

These three components are usually cemented in place, but some doctors use a cementless technique that helps the bone grow into the implant to help increase stability.

A cementless technique may be used on patients who are young, healthy and have strong bone structure around the knee. Because bone cement can break away and cause an implant to loosen, cementless knee replacements are less likely to loosen over time.

For this reason, cemented knee replacements are considered better suited for older, less active patients.

Types of Knee Implants

There are multiple types of knee implants that doctors and patients can discuss before choosing the best option. The decision is based on a patient’s condition and activity level.

Types of Knee Implants:

Fixed bearing

This is the implant most patients receive. Less mobile and not as strong as other implants. It is best suited for patients who are not overweight and who do not have an active lifestyle. It is usually recommended for elderly patients who will not put serious wear-and-tear on the implant.

In a fixed bearing design, a metal implant is attached to the tibia and a polyethylene component is attached atop it, creating a cushioned surface. Another component is attached to the femur, where it can roll on the polyethylene.

The drawback is that this contact causes wear on the polyethylene. Studies have shown that this stress is a leading cause of fixed bearing long-term implant failures. It wears away the polyethelyne component, causing the implant to loosening. Loosening is not only painful, it is also a major cause of implant failure.

Studies have shown 95 percent of fixed bearing implants continue to function properly 10 years after patients received them.

Mobile bearing (rotating platform)

This design allows the plastic cushion of the tibial component to rotate, giving patients greater flexibility on the medial (inner) and lateral (outer) sides of the knee. Mobile bearing implants work well for young and active patients.

The polyethylene component in mobile bearing implants is designed to fit into the metal tibial tray component in a way that allows this limited rotation. The design was introduced to limit the polyethylene wear seen in fixed-bearing designs. It produces less stress between components and in theory should reduce chances or at least delay loosening.

Mobile bearing implants tend to have less stress between the femoral and tibular surfaces, granting the flexibility to benefit a patient’s gait and even deep knee bends. However, their long-term durability is about the same as for fixed bearing implants in older patients.

Like the fixed-bearing design, mobile bearing knee implants have a 95 percent survival rate ten years after being implanted.

Medial pivot (mobile bearing)

The medial pivot design incorporates a mobile bearing to more effectively replicate the natural function of the knee. It rotates, twists, bends, and flexes like a natural knee joint. More complicated than fixed or standard mobile bearing designs, it can be more expensive.

Instead of a “hinge joint” approach used by more conventional knee replacements, the components of a medial pivot implant incorporate a “ball-and-socket” approach. It tends to be more stable than some other implant designs and because it allows for a large contact area between components, it reduces wear-and-tear extending the life-expectancy of the implant.

A 2017 study of 325 patients, with a total of 345 medial pivot knee implants, showed good long-term results for the design. Researchers conducted follow ups with patients over an average 15.2 years.

They found 98.8% of medial pivot implants survived to 17 years and 94 percent of patients were able to do age-appropriate activities, with an average knee bend of 120 degrees, in their final follow up sessions.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining (non-constrained)

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) runs along the back of the knee, connecting the femur to the tibia. This designs keeps the PCL intact, but it depends on several patient factors: good bone quality, few defects in the bones, intact soft tissue around the knee and a functional PCL.

Preserving the ligament may not necessarily result in better post-operative knee function. A simple polyethylene bearing attaches to a metal component implanted in the tibia, and a metal implant in the femur hinges on the polyethylene. It is a minimal design dependent on the PCL to stabilize the implant but a tight PCL may lead to excessive wear on the bearing.

A 2015 study reviewed 15 years of followups of patients who had received PCL retaining implants. It found 98.7 percent of the implants survived 10 years and 83.6 percent survived 17 years.

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) substituting (constrained)

This design replaces ligament with plastic components. It is recommended primarily for patients with severely damaged knees or weak ligaments. Also used in revision surgery.

The PLC substituting design has a tall post attached to the tibia which fits into a deep box attached to the femur. The two are not connected with any kind of hinge joint. A polyethylene bearing attaches to the tibial component.

This design may allow for more knee flexibility that the PCL retaining design, but it may also release more polyethylene debris because of friction between its components.

A 2016 study of the PLC substituting design found 88.5 percent of PLC substituting implants used in initial knee replacement surgery survived 10 years. For revision surgery, the 10 year survival rate was 75.8 percent if the revision surgery was due to some cause other than infection, and 54.6 percent if revision was due to infection.

Gender specific

Women undergo more knee replacements than men – accounting for roughly two-thirds of all knee replacement surgeries in the U.S. Surgeons performing knee replacements have long reported anatomical differences between men and women which make a “one-size-fits-all” approach ineffective in knee replacement surgery.

"Female anatomy is a little different," Dr. Anthony Unger, a surgeon who has performed hundreds of knee replacements told NPR in 2007. "The end of the bone called the femur (thigh) is a little different contour."

Modifying the way implants fit between men and women can tailor the device’s performance to the patient.

Many women may be shorter or have smaller body frames than the overall population. Gender-specific implants, engineered to the various, different dimensions of male and female body frames are designed to perform better for specific patients.

Differences Between Total and Partial Knee Replacement

Knee replacement surgery is recommended when conservative treatments like physical therapy, braces, steroid injections and anti-inflammatory medication fail to alleviate pain.

If a patient requires surgery on both knees, it’s called a bilateral knee replacement. The two procedures can be done simultaneously or doctors may choose to use a staged bilateral approach that schedules the second surgery several days, weeks or months later.

The decision to have a total versus a partial knee replacement is based on a doctor’s recommendation after a full patient evaluation is performed.

Total Knee Replacement

A total knee replacement is actually the resurfacing of the bones in all three compartments of the knee joint: The medial compartment, the lateral compartment and the patellofemoral (front) compartment.

The procedure resurfaces the end of the femur, the top of the tibia, and the patella. The ligaments that support the knee can be left in place or removed, depending on their condition and the type of implant chosen. Any existing cartilage between the femur and tibia is replaced with a plastic cushion.

total knee replacement xray

Partial Knee Replacement

A partial knee replacement is a procedure that resurfaces one (unicompartmental) or two (bicompartmental) sides of the knee. Partial implant components are named for the area of the knee they resurface: Medial unicondylar component, lateral unicondylar component and patellofemoral component.

A patellofemoral surgery replaces the end of the thigh bone with a metal piece and resurfaces the back of the patella. A partial knee replacement can also include a knee osteotomy, in which a surgeon removes or adds a wedge of bone to the tibia or femur to take some of the weight off of the damaged part of the knee.

partial knee replacement xray

Common and Serious Complications of Knee Replacement

While knee implants give many recipients a second chance at walking and living a more normal life, complications do occur.

Most problematic is a loosening of the implant, which can be caused by a defective implant or poor positioning at the time of surgery. Implant loosening is a primary cause for revision surgery.

Although rare, metallosis is possible after knee replacement surgery. Metallosis, also known as metal poisoning, can occur when metal implant pieces rub against each other and release tiny metal particles into the knee joint and bloodstream.

This can happen when the plastic cushion separating the femoral and tibial components wears down from high usage. This usually takes a few years to occur, and revision surgery is required.

Joint infection is also rare — occurring in less than 2 percent of patients — but is considered one of the most serious complications following knee replacement surgery. Infections are usually related to sterility issues and the hospital where the surgery takes place.

Common complications from knee surgery include:

  • Swelling and stiffness
  • Pain and soreness
  • Nerve and tissue damage
  • Blood clots

Many of these common complications go away or significantly improve within a couple of weeks, but rehabilitation after surgery typically lasts several months.

Expected Lifespan and Need for Revision Surgery

Knee replacements generally last at least 15 years and can last far beyond 20 years, but not all patients experience the same results.

For patients whose artificial joint wears out earlier than expected — or who received a defective implant — revision surgery is required. Any serious complication can also lead to revision surgery. In addition, younger recipients require revision surgery when the first implant wears out.

Revision surgery rates for knee replacements are quickly rising. In 2010, more than 55,000 revision surgeries were performed in the U.S., with 48 percent of the revisions in patients under 65. Total costs for each surgery averaged to be more than $49,000.

By 2030, estimates are there will be nearly 268,000 performed each year — a 600 percent increase from 2005, when there were approximately 38,000 knee replacement revisions.

Implants that are used in revision surgeries typically have thicker, longer stems for added stability and to replace bone loss. In addition, surgeons typically implant a constrained (hinged) knee during revision surgery because it provides strength for severely damaged knees and weak ligaments. The vast majority of these procedures result in favorable long-term outcomes. However, as with any surgery, there is a risk of complications.

Risks of complications include:

  • Infection in the wound or the new prosthesis
  • Blood clots
  • Poor wound healing
  • Bone fracture during surgery
  • Bleeding
  • Heart attack, stroke or lung complications (rare)

Knee Implant Manufacturers and Recalls

Artificial knee joint manufacturers face increased scrutiny — and thousands of lawsuits — over recalled products and high failure rates.

In 2007, four of the nation’s largest knee implant manufacturers agreed to pay $310 million in penalties to settle federal charges stating that they paid surgeons to use their devices.

The companies that had to pay were Zimmer Holdings, DePuy Orthopaedics, Smith & Nephew, and Biomet. Stryker Orthopaedics agreed to federal supervision for 18 months in lieu of a monetary penalty.

Zimmer Holdings

Zimmer Holdings manufactures numerous knee components including the Persona Knee System and the NexGen MIS Tibial Component. Zimmer recalled the MIS Tibial Component in 2010 after reports indicated the component’s locking screws and stem extensions failed to interlock correctly.

The company still faces hundreds of lawsuits related to high failure rates of NexGen implants. Those cases are consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Illinois.

DePuy Holdings

DePuy, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, is one of the largest joint replacement manufacturers in the world and is known for its High-Flex knee implants: the Sigma CR150 High-Flex Knee System and the Sigma RP-F Knee System.

However, DePuy has issued hundreds of recalls over the years. Between 2003 and 2013, DePuy recalled 277 devices or components, more than any other knee implant manufacturer. The company also had the most FDA Class I recalls — considered the most serious — with four. In 2012, DePuy recalled a number of its custom devices after the FDA warned the company it had failed to seek the agency’s approval for commercial sales.

Stryker

In January 2012, Stryker Orthopaedics recalled 26,000 of its EIUS Unicompartmental Knee Systems over higher revision rates. The recall came several years after the FDA warned Stryker about procedural problems at joint manufacturing facilities in Ireland and New Jersey. The 2007 warning letters targeted two knee replacement components — the Duracon and the Scorpio — and other joint components.

Stryker agreed to pay $80 million in 2014 to resolve criminal and civil liability related to faulty cutting guides used for knee replacement surgeries. The guides were a product of OtisMed Corporation, a subsidiary of Stryker.

Smith & Nephew

In 2003, Smith & Nephew recalled its Oxinium Genesis II and Oxinium Profix II knee devices after reports of pain, loosening and revision surgeries. In 2008, the company recalled its TC-PLUS, VKS and RT-PLUS knee models because the implants contained higher-than-specified levels of iron.

A third recall was issued in 2010 for the Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate knee component because the base plates and inserts were prone to breaking.

Biomet

In 2007, Biomet recalled its Vanguard PS Open Box Femoral Component because it was mislabeled. In 2008, the company issued another recall for the Vanguard DCM PS Plus Tibial Bearing implant because the sizing information was incorrect.

Most recently, in January 2017, the company issued a Class II recall for its Vanguard Total Knee System because of mislabeling and packaging problems. The recall affects 15,000 products on the market in the U.S. and 21 other countries.

Author

Matt Mauney is a writer and researcher for Drugwatch.com. Before joining the Drugwatch team, he spent 10 years in journalism working for various newspapers and news websites.

View Sources
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017, March 6). Arthritis-Related Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/data_statistics/arthritis_related_stats.htm
  2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2015, August). Total Knee Replacement. Retrieved from http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00389
  3. Orthogate. (2006, July 20). Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee. Retrieved from http://www.orthogate.org/patient-education/knee/revision-arthroplasty-of-the-knee.html
  4. Bonesmart. (2010). Reasons for Knee Replacement Surgery. Retrieved from http://bonesmart.org/knee/conditions-leading-to-knee-replacement-surgery/
  5. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2016, April). Knee Replacement Implants. Retrieved from http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00221
  6. Dr. Moore, D. (2012, September 12). Total Knee Arthroplasty Prosthesis Design. Retrieved from http://www.orthobullets.com/recon/5019/tka-prosthesis-design
  7. Kim, Young-Hoo. et al. (2008, May 9). Early Outcome of TKA with a Medial Pivot Fixed-Bearing Prosthesis is Worse than with a PFC Mobile-Bearing Prosthesis. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628493/
  8. Greengard, S. (2012, April 30). Guide to Knee Replacement Implants and Their Manufacturers. Retrieved from http://www.healthline.com/health/total-knee-replacement-surgery/implant-manufacturers?utm_account=R-S&utm_medium=google&utm_semcampaign=TKR+-+Reconstructive+Surgeries+[Surgical+Procedures]+-+ROC&utm_adgroup=knee+replacement+manufacturers+-+Broad&utm_match=Broad&utm_query=knee%20implant%20recall&utm_term=knee+implant+recall&utm_content=11667270280&utm_source=google&marinid=sQL5Dv74C&gclid=CMGizuzhzrICFYyPPAodbwwAeg#1
  9. Romesburg, J. et al. (2010, September). Metallosis and Metal-Induced Synovitis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Review of Radiographic and CT Findings. Retrieved from http://www.radiologycases.com/index.php/radiologycases/article/view/423/fulltext
  10. Amendola, L. et al. (2012, January 27). History of Condylar Total Knee Arthroplasty. Retrieved from http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/26895.pdf
  11. Your Practice Online. Revision Knee Replacement. Retrieved from http://www.hipsknees.info/flash8/rkr.pdf
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2009 Table, Procedures by Selected Patient Characteristics – Number by Procedure Category and Age. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhds/4procedures/2009pro4_numberprocedureage.pdf
  13. United States District Court Northern District of Illinois. MDL 2272 In Re Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation. Retrieved from http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/mdl-details.aspx?WNesDQBcWakSF/4TSCIYmQ==
  14. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. OtisMed Corporation former CEO sentenced for shipping adulterated knee replacement cutting guides. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm452987.htm
  15. Meier, B. (2010, June 19). Surgeon vs. Knee Maker: Who’s Rejecting Whom? The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/business/20knee.html
  16. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2012 September). MDL Statistics Report - Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets. Retrieved from http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets-By-District-September-2012.pdf
  17. Corso, J. (2017, March 16). Another Bellwether Drops out of Zimmer Knee Implant MDL. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/articles/902900?scroll=1
  18. Jones, D. (2017, January 26). Zimmer Gets Win In 3rd Knee Implant Bellwether. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/articles/885190/zimmer-gets-win-in-3rd-knee-implant-bellwether
  19. ConsumersUnion. (2013, September 9). A Summary of Knee Recalls Consumers Union Safe Patient Project. Retrieved from http://safepatientproject.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Knee-Recall-Summary-final-9-9-13.pdf
  20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2013, February 22). DePuy Orthopaedics LPS Diaphyseal Sleeve: Class I Recall-Taper Connection May Not Accommodate Physiologic Loads. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/
  21. Gibbs, G. (2003, September 18). Knee implant recall hits Smith & Nephew. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/sep/18/6
  22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2017, January 28). Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Total Knee System. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfRES/res.cfm?id=151861
  23. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (n.d.) Beyond Surgery Day: The Full Impact of Knee Replacement. Retrieved from http://www.anationinmotion.org/value/knee/
  24. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (n.d.) Total Knee Replacement Surgery By the Numbers. Retrieved from http://www.anationinmotion.org/value/total-knee-replacement-surgery-numbers/
  25. Bhandari, M. et al. (2012, December 5). Clinical and Economic Burden of Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520180/
  26. Creative Commons. (n.d.). Partial Knee Replacement. https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult.php?img=PMC3767902_ksrr-25-150-g005&query=partial+knee+replacement&lic=bync&req=4&npos=1
  27. Huang, C-H., Liau, J-J., and Cheng, C-K. (2007, January 5). Fixed or Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784078/
  28. Macheras, G.A., et al. (2017, March). A Long Term Clinical Outcome of the Medial Pivot Knee Arthroplasty System. Retrieved from: http://www.thekneejournal.com/article/S0968-0160(17)30029-7/fulltext
  29. Siqueira, M.B., et al. (2016, September 28). The Varus-Valgus Constrained Knee Implant: Survivorship and Outcomes. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/articles/27680890/
  30. Lee, J.K. (2015, June). Long-Term Results of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Minimum 15-Year Review. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447514/
  31. Mulcahy, H. and Chew, F.S. (2013, May 30). Current Concepts in Knee Replacement: Features and Imaging Assessment. Retrieved from: http://www.ajronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2214/AJR.13.11307
  32. Aubrey, A. (2007, August 30). Knee Replacements, Designed for Women. Retrieved from: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14024536
Free Knee Replacements Case Review