Knee Replacement Lawsuits

Knee replacement lawsuits claim the devices loosened, became unstable and required revision surgery to correct the problems. Depuy Attune, Zimmer NexGen and Arthrex iBalance knee implants are among the models named in knee replacement lawsuits. Some devices have been recalled.

DePuy Attune Knee
Knee Replacement Lawsuit Facts
  1. Injuries Loosening, pain, bone or device fractures, infection, need for revision surgery
  2. Manufacturers DePuy Synthes, Zimmer Biomet, Arthrex, Exactech, B. Braun, Smith & Nephew
  3. Top Settlement $1 billion to settle 4,000 lawsuits against Sulzer Medica (now part of Zimmer Biomet)

Thousands of people have filed knee replacement lawsuits in recent years — most of which claim the devices loosened because of a design defect or other flaw.

Attorneys in Alabama filed the first lawsuit against Attune Knee Replacement manufacturer DePuy Synthes in September 2017. A steady stream of filings around the country followed. Lawyers estimate hundreds of patients may sue the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary in 2018.

There are no publicly announced Attune settlements. None of the cases has gone to trial, so there are no verdicts yet.

The Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant multidistrict litigation is currently the only active knee replacement MDL.

A federal panel combined the first 18 cases in an Illinois federal court in August 2011. There were more than 1,700 lawsuits in the MDL at one time but most were dismissed.

In February 2018, Zimmer announced a settlement in the remaining lawsuits. The exact amount of the settlement is unknown. The company and the patients who sued agreed to keep the amount confidential. There were 179  cases still pending as of July 2019.

Though most of the recent lawsuits name DePuy and Zimmer, people have also claimed injuries from other models of knee replacements including B. Braun and Arthrex Inc.

At least 25 people sued B. Braun in a California court in 2017. All said they had to have revision surgery after their knee replacements failed.

After Arthrex Inc. announced a recall for its Arthrex iBalance Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Tray in 2015, patients who claimed the device loosened and led to revision surgery filed lawsuits.

Knee Replacement Manufacturers and Models Named in Lawsuits
Manufacturer Model Name Why People Are Suing
Arthrex iBalance Knee Loosening, defective tibial tray
B. Braun Advanced Surface ceramic coated knees Loosening due to cement failure
DePuy Attune Knee System Loosening and instability
Exactech Optetrack Knee Excessive wear and premature failure
Zimmer Biomet NexGen

Persona
Premature loosening

Loosening due to defective screws
Stryker Duracon Unicompartmental Knee System Pain, instability, restricted motion
Experiencing complications after a knee replacement? Get a Free Case Review

Lawsuits Claim Different Flaws Caused Loosening

People filed lawsuits over the DePuy Attune and Zimmer NexGen knees because the devices failed to attach to patients’ bones, which made the knee replacements unstable. Patients needed revision surgery to repair the loose implants.

Radiography of a knee showing a loosening of the prosthesis
Source: Knee replacement lawsuits blame manufacturers for loosening of the prosthesis.

In 2010, Zimmer recalled 68,000 NexGen Knee components, warning that the knee replacement could loosen if the device was not fully cemented or a stem was not used. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration received more than 100 reports of the knees loosening prematurely.

The company recalled another 40,000 in 2014, citing a faulty connection in the knee system. It said threads on one part were “out of specification.” Surgeons were supposed to screw a stem extension or plug into the threads, but the flaw could prevent a perfect fit. Over time, the joint could loosen.

DePuy’s Attune knee has never been recalled, but people filed lawsuits over the implants claiming tibial loosening. They said the cement failed to bond the implant’s base plate to the patient’s tibia, which is one of the bones in the lower leg.

Arthrex recalled about 2,400 units of its iBalance TKA Tibial Tray in December 2015. According to the recall, the outer surface of the metal had a smooth texture which was different from previous textured parts. Patients who filed lawsuits said the tibial tray loosened which led to device failure and revision surgery.

Journey I BCS Knee Lawsuits

Lawyers are also accepting cases from people with Journey I BCS knee implants who’ve needed revision surgeries because of loosening of the device’s femoral component. These complications are painful and surgery can be risky and costly.

The company’s post-market surveillance data showed that people implanted with the first-generation Journey BCS Knee System had a revision rate of more than 1.5 times the average for hip implants.

Smith & Nephew issued a voluntary recall of its Journey I BCS femoral and tibial insert components in June 2018 — more than a decade after the device was first approved by the FDA.

“[P]atients that have been implanted with a first generation JOURNEY™ BCS Knee System may have a higher risk of requiring a revision earlier than they or their surgeon had expected.”

“Our analysis of available post-market surveillance data suggests that patients that have been implanted with a first generation JOURNEY™ BCS Knee System may have a higher risk of requiring a revision earlier than they or their surgeon had expected,” the company stated in a June 2018 Urgent Field Safety Notice.

But signs of problems with Smith & Nephew’s first-generation Journey Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) Knee Replacement System were evident much earlier. In 2014, the Australian government sounded a warning about high failure rates associated with the device.

The company began phasing out the product around the same time. But it sold approximately 42,050 Journey I BCS Knee Systems globally before discontinuing the device.

If you had a Journey I BCS knee replacement in 2010 or later and are suffering from complications, you may eligible for compensation.

Largest Settlement Involving Knees

One of the largest settlements involving knee replacements was a $1 billion payment in 2002. Sulzer Medica agreed to pay $1 billion to settle roughly 4,000 lawsuits over its hip and knee implants.

Knee Replacement Settlement Payouts
Settlement amounts in the Sulzer Medica case averaged $200,000 per patient
Source: The New York Times, Feb. 2, 2002

The Swiss company recalled 25,000 joint implants in 2001 after about 200 people reported complications with the devices. The company estimated at least 17,000 people had already received the affected implants. About 90 percent of those patients were in the U.S.

The company determined that the parts had shipped with an oily residue on the implants. It prevented bone from adhering to the devices, allowing them to loosen. The Wall Street Journal reported that 561 patients who received Sulzer knees had to have their knees replaced by the time of the settlement.

Sulzer changed its name to Centerpulse after the recall. Zimmer acquired it in 2003 for $3.2 billion.

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.

Terry Turner
Written By Terry Turner Writer

Terry Turner has been writing articles and producing news broadcasts for more than 25 years. He covers FDA policy, proton pump inhibitors, and medical devices such as hernia mesh, IVC filters, and hip and knee implants. An Emmy-winning journalist, he has reported on health and medical policy issues before Congress, the FDA and other federal agencies. Some of his qualifications include:

  • American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) and The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates member
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Literacy certificates
  • Original works published or cited in Washington Examiner, MedPage Today and The New York Times
  • Appeared as an expert panelist on hernia mesh lawsuits on the BBC
Edited By
Medically Reviewed By
Dr. Aimee V. Hachigian-Gould
Dr. Aimee V. Hachigian-Gould Orthopedic Surgeon

31 Cited Research Articles

  1. Bonutti, P.M. et al. (2017, June 7). Unusually High Rate of Early Failure of Tibial Component in Attune Total Knee Arthroplasty System at Implant-Cement Interface. Retrieved from https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0037-1603756
  2. Lexis Legal News. (2015, November 11). 1st NexGen Knee Bellwether Trial Ends in Defense Verdict For Defendant Zimmer Inc. Retrieved from https://www.lexislegalnews.com/articles/3884/1st-nexgen-knee-bellwether-trial-ends-in-defense-verdict-for-defendant-zimmer-inc
  3. Corso, J. (2017, March 16). Another Bellwether Drops out of Zimmer Knee Implant MDL. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/articles/902900?scroll=1
  4. Jones, D.N. (2017, January 26). Zimmer Gets Win in 3rd Knee Implant Bellwether. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/articles/885190/zimmer-gets-win-in-3rd-knee-implant-bellwether
  5. Fair, M. (2016, June 6). Zimmer Gets $20M Knee Injury Verdict Trashed in Pa. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/articles/804139/zimmer-gets-20m-knee-injury-verdict-trashed-in-pa
  6. Bodine, L. (2017, January 6). Judge Admits Causation Expert in Zimmer knee Replacement MDL. Retrieved from https://www.masstortnexus.com/mass-torts-news/judge-admits-causation-expert-in-zimmer-knee-replacement-mdl/
  7. U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois. (n.d.). MDL 2272 In Re Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation. Retrieved from https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/mdl-details.aspx?WNesDQBcWakSF/4TSCIYmQ==
  8. PR Newswire. (2017, September 18). First U.S. Lawsuit Filed Against DePuy-Synthes for Attune Knee Replacement Failure. Orthopedic Design & Technology. Retrieved from https://www.odtmag.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2017-09-18/first-us-lawsuit-filed-against-depuy-synthes-for-attune-knee-replacement-failure/
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2015, June 26) OtisMed Corporation former CEO sentenced for shipping adulterated knee replacement cutting guides. Retrieved from https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170112222748/http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm452987.htm
  10. Meier, B. (2010, June 19). Surgeon vs. Knee Maker: Who’s Rejecting Whom? The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/business/20knee.html
  11. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2012, October 1). Order Vacating Conditional Transfer Order. In Re Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2272. Retrieved from http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/MDL-2272-Order_Vacating_CTO-09-12.pdf
  12. Meier, B. (2011, December 22). New Models of Implants Not Better, Study Finds. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/health/research/new-models-of-hip-and-knee-implants-not-better-study-finds.html
  13. Duroni, L. (2015, April 14). Smith & Nephew Sued Over Failed Knee Replacement. Retrieved https://www.law360.com/articles/643110/smith-nephew-sued-over-failed-knee-replacement
  14. U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana (Lafayette). (2012) Civil Docket for Case # 6:12-cv-00761-RFD-PJH. Henry Bias V. Smith & Nephew. Retrieved from https://www.pacer.gov/
  15. U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. (2014, July 1). Manuel A. Sanchez V. Johnson & Johnson Service Inc., Johnson & Johnson Incorporated, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.; DePuy Orthopedics, Inc., and Doe Defendants 1-100. Complaint. Retrieved from https://www.pacer.gov/
  16. U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. (2015, November 9). Manuel A. Sanchez V. Johnson & Johnson Service Inc., Johnson & Johnson Incorporated, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc.; DePuy Orthopedics, Inc., and Doe Defendants 1-100. Stipulation For Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims and Parties. Retrieved from https://www.pacer.gov/
  17. U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois. (2017, May 8). MDL 2272 In Re Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation. Case Number 1:11-cv-05468. Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Suggestion of Remand. Retrieved from https://www.pacer.gov/
  18. U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois. (2017, May 23). MDL 2272 In Re Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation. Case Number 1:11-cv-05468. Notification of Docket Entry. Minutes. Retrieved from https://www.pacer.gov/
  19. Dye, J. (2015, November 6). Zimmer wins first U.S. trial over NexGen Flex knee devices. Retrieved https://www.reuters.com/article/zimmer-biomet-nexgen-idUSL1N1312VM20151106
  20. Trader, S. (2016, October 24). Zimmer Gets Quick Win In 2nd Knee Implant Defect Bellwether. Retrieved https://www.law360.com/articles/854476/zimmer-gets-quick-win-in-2nd-knee-implant-defect-bellwether
  21. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. (2018, February 12). In re: Zimmer NexGen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation. Case Management Order No. 13. Retrieved from https://jc6kx1c9izw3wansr3nmip8k-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018-02-12-Order-1.pdf
  22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2009, July 7). Class 2 Device Recall Duracon Total Knee System Tibial Components. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=74712
  23. New York Times. (2002, February 2). Company News; Sulzer Mdeica Pays to Settle U.S. Claims over Implants. Bloomberg News. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/02/business/company-news-sulzer-medica-pays-to-settle-us-claims-over-implants.html
  24. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2019, April 15). MDL Statistics Report - Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by District. Retrieved from https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_District-April-15-2019.pdf
  25. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2015, December 17). Class 2 Device Recall Arthrex IBalance TKA Tibial Tray. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=143925
  26. Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration. Retrieved from https://www.tga.gov.au/alert/journey-bi-cruciate-stabilised-bcs-knee-replacement-system-femoral-implant
  27. Christen, B. & Kopjar, B. (2018, November). Second-generation bi-cruciate stabilized total knee system has a lower reoperation and revision rate than its predecessor. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-018-3019-5
  28. Eisner, W. (2018, August 8). Safety Notice for S&N Journey BSC Knee. Retrieved from https://ryortho.com/breaking/safety-notice-for-sn-journey-bsc-knee/
  29. Smith & Nephew. (2018, June 13). Urgent Field Safety Notice. Retrieved from https://mhra.filecamp.com/public/file/3l5k-3don01i7
  30. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2019, April 9). Class 2 Device Recall Journey BCS Knee System. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/SCRIPTs/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=165170
  31. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2019, July 16). MDL Statistics Report. Retrieved from https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_Actions_Pending-July-16-2019.pdf
View All Sources
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

Drugwatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.

(888) 603-5631