Reverse Shoulder Lawsuits

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Class I recall for the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder medical device in December 2016 due to a high fracture rate. The recall involves 3,662 shoulder replacement devices distributed from 2008 to 2015. Zimmer Biomet settled the first lawsuit over the implants' fracturing in early 2016.

Last Modified: May 16, 2024
Fact Checked

Editors carefully fact-check all content for accuracy and quality. has a stringent fact-checking process. It starts with our strict sourcing guidelines.

We only gather information from credible sources. This includes peer-reviewed medical journals, reputable media outlets, government reports, court records and interviews with qualified experts.

Why Trust DrugWatch? has been empowering patients for more than a decade has provided reliable, trusted information about medications, medical devices and general health since 2008. We’ve also connected thousands of people injured by drugs and medical devices with top-ranked national law firms to take action against negligent corporations.

Our team includes experienced medical writers, award-winning journalists, researchers and certified medical and legal experts. is HONCode (Health On the Net Foundation) certified. This means the high-quality information we provide comes from credible sources, such as peer-reviewed medical journals and expert interviews.

The information on has been medically and legally reviewed by more than 30 expert contributors, including doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, patient advocates and other health care professionals. Our writers are members of professional associations, including American Medical Writers Association, American Bar Association, The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates and International Society for Medical Publication Professionals.


  • Assisting patients and their families since 2008.
  • Helped more than 12,000 people find legal help.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed medical and legal information site.
Learn More About Us


"Drugwatch opened my eyes to the realities of big pharmacy. Having a family member with major depression and anxiety, I was looking for information on her medications. I found information that was very helpful, that her psychiatrist never told her."
Marianne Zahren Patient’s Family Member
  • Google Business Rating
  • BBB A+ Rating Logo

Status of Lawsuits

There was no multidistrict litigation formed and Drugwatch is not aware of any attorneys currently accepting Comprehensive Shoulder System lawsuits. The first lawsuit over the implants’ fracturing was settled in early 2016 – nine months before a second recall was issued.

In that case, Alfonso Alarid of Denver, Colorado, received a Comprehensive Shoulder System to replace his left shoulder in September 2009. He received another Comprehensive implant to replace his right shoulder in July 2010.

While undergoing physical therapy in 2012, the humeral tray separated from the stem in his left shoulder and Alarid had to have the implant replaced. In March 2013, the implant in his right shoulder failed in a similar fashion and it, too, had to be replaced.

Both of the devices were among the 47 Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder systems affected by Biomet’s September 2010 recall.

Alarid filed a lawsuit in state court in Colorado against Biomet in July 2014, before the company merged with Zimmer.

Did You Know?
A 2014 lawsuit claimed recalled Comprehensive shoulders were “defective and unreasonably dangerous.”

In his complaint, Alarid claimed that Biomet had received multiple reports of problems with the device. He also claimed Biomet had sold implants in “defective and unreasonably dangerous condition” that resulted in his injuries requiring two revision surgeries.

The case was moved to federal court in Denver in September 2015.

In February 2016, Biomet, by then a part of Zimmer Biomet, agreed to pay Alarid $350,000 to settle the claims against the company.

Denver's Federal Court building
Zimmer agreed to pay $350,000 to settle the claims against them in Denver's federal court, pictured above

In its annual report, Zimmer Biomet listed three major litigations against the company over the Zimmer Durom Cup hip implant, the Zimmer NexGen Knee implant system and the Biomet M2a Magnum hip implant.

“Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit, can be costly to defend,” the company said in its

Fractured Components Lead to Zimmer Biomet Recall

In December 2016, Zimmer Biomet recalled 3,662 reverse shoulder components of its Comprehensive model line. It was one of the largest recalls of reverse shoulder devices in recent years.

In the recall notice, Zimmer Biomet said its Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System Humeral Tray Model 115340 suffered a high fracture rate. Recalled units had been manufactured between August 2008 and September 2011. Trays manufactured after that time incorporated design changes to prevent fractures.

The affected trays were distributed as late as September 2015.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration categorized the action as a Class I recall, the agency’s most serious type.

In an Urgent Field Safety Notice, the company warned that fractures could require patients to undergo revision surgery which could cause serious health complications including infection, loss of shoulder function and death.

Zimmer Biomet said immediate health risks were not likely, but the devices posed long-term risks. The most likely and most severe risk was that people implanted with the affected models would need revision surgery sometime in the future if the component fractured.

Shoulder replacements are surgically implanted devices that help restore arm movement. This is helpful for people who have tears to their rotator cuffs and have developed arthropathy, or severe shoulder arthritis.

Reverse shoulder implants are named for the way they “reverse” human anatomy of the shoulder. Instead of a ball on the upper arm bone that fits into a socket on the shoulder blade, the implants put the ball on the shoulder and the socket on the arm.

A humeral tray attaches to a stem that has been inserted into the humerus, or upper arm bone. A bearing is then fitted to the tray to form the socket of the new joint.

Devices, Tools Taken Off Market

The 2016 recall was the fourth involving Zimmer or Biomet reverse shoulder devices since 2010. It also involved the largest number of reverse shoulder devices since Zimmer’s recall of 9,800 tools used in implant surgery for both conventional and reverse shoulder implants in 2010.

That recall affected nearly 9,800 Distal Pilots, used in implanting Zimmer’s Trabecular Metal Shoulder, because they were not functioning properly, and the problem could prevent the implant from fitting appropriately to the arm bone. The problem could also lead to a delay in surgery, a bone fracture, or the need to alter the way the implant was attached.

Other recalls of reverse shoulder devices between 2010 and 2016 had not been so large. While different companies had recalled devices, for the most part, the numbers of actual units affected had been small.

Timeline of Manufacturers and their Recalled Devices
  • 2017

    Manufacturer/Device - Zimmer Biomet Modular Hybrid Glenoid Base Large for the Comprehensive Shoulder System

    Units Recalled - 16

    Reason for Recall - Two pieces from the lot were moved to finished goods and shipped despite having an open Non-Conformance Report (NCR). The NCR indicated that one piece from the lot had scratches and the other non-conforming threads

  • 2017

    Manufacturer/Device - Zimmer Biomet Comprehensive Humeral stems

    Units Recalled - 12

    Reason for Recall - The lots were commingled during the manufacturing process and were etched with incorrect lot numbers. The size difference between the two stem sizes is 1.1 inches.

  • 2016

    Manufacturer/Device - Tornier (Wright Medical) Aeuqalis Fx2 shoulder implants, both traditional and reverse configuration

    Units Recalled - 30

    Reason for Recall - Reports of dislocations

  • 2015

    Manufacturer/Device - Zimmer Biomet 25mm size Glenosphere Mini Baseplate for the Comprehensive system

    Units Recalled - 11

    Reason for Recall - Taper adaptor missing from package, delaying surgery by more than 30 minutes

  • 2014

    Manufacturer/Device - Integra Titan Reverse Shoulder right and left head cutting templates

    Units Recalled - 12

    Reason for Recall - Template for cutting bone was welded backwards, resulting in wrong angle

  • 2011

    Manufacturer/Device - Encore Medical RSP Humeral Socket Shell

    Units Recalled - 81

    Reason for Recall - Device had the potential to not appropriately connect with the stem attached to the arm bone

  • 2010

    Manufacturer/Device - Biomet (later Zimmer Biomet) Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder Humeral Tray with 49mm Locking Ring

    Units Recalled - 47

    Reason for Recall - Reports of the device fracturing

Show More

The FDA classified these other recalls as Class II – a situation where the device “may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences” or where there is a remote probability of serious health risks.

FDA Critical of Indiana Manufacturing Plant

The Comprehensive model line was originally produced by Biomet, Inc., which Zimmer Holdings acquired for nearly $14 billion in 2015, creating Zimmer Biomet.

In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Biomet had reported that in 2013, “demand for the Comprehensive Shoulder System allowed us to achieve the leadership position in the United States in both the anatomic shoulder and reverse shoulder markets.”

But Zimmer’s acquisition brought it problems as well as anticipated profits.

Just a month before the 2016 recall, the FDA issued a lengthy list of potential violations at what prior to the merger had been a Biomet manufacturing plant in Warsaw, Indiana.

FDA inspectors looked over the facility between September and November 2016, before issuing a 58-page review of issues they found.

Inspectors said the plant lacked "established procedures" for such things as:
  • Verifying inspection and testing results
  • Controlling products that failed to conform to specifications
  • Having a system to rework non-conforming products
  • Controlling product design
  • Performing corrective or preventative actions
  • Formally reviewing and evaluating product complaints

Inspectors also found the facility did not sample products based on a valid statistical model.

“While the Company is taking the necessary steps to address certain regulatory compliance gaps at the legacy Biomet operation in Warsaw, it remains confident in the quality, safety and efficacy of all of its products,” Zimmer Biomet said in a statement following the inspection. “No patient safety concerns have been identified with any of the products manufactured at the site.”

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.