ALERT: Your health is top priority. We’re committed to providing reliable COVID-19 resources to keep you informed and safe.

Study Says Mirena is Best Treatment for Heavy Periods; Risks Exist

Mirena IUD

A clinical trial conducted by researchers from the Universities of Birmingham and Nottingham revealed that the Mirena intrauterine device (IUD) treated heavy menstrual cycles better than other conventional medical options. The study, called the ECLIPSE study, was published in the December 2012 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The trial involved 571 women who consulted general practitioners about heavy periods, a condition known as menorrhagia. Large numbers of women suffer from menorrhagia, and it accounted for 20 percent of all gynecological referrals in the United Kingdom. In the United States, 10 million women are affected by menorrhagia. Although Mirena was shown to be effective at treating heavy periods, it still has a risk of side effects.

More Women Preferred Mirena

The study participants agreed to be randomly assigned various treatments for heavy periods, including Mirena or mefenamic acid and tranexamic acid combined with varying combinations of estrogen and progestin. Scientists measured factors such as individual patient experience, practical difficulties with work, social and family life, and overall physical and mental health over a period of two years.

After two years, women using Mirena were roughly twice as likely to still be using it than those taking other medications, and 49 percent of the women in the trial who were not initially assigned to the IUD switched to it. According to the participants, the other treatments were not effective.

One of the study authors, Janesh Gupta, professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Birmingham, said: “This trial should encourage the use of IUDs in primary care. This trial shows that LNG-IUS (Mirena) is the more effective first choice, as assessed by the impact of bleeding on women’s quality of life.”

The doctors in the study also pointed out that many women who have heavy menstrual bleeding do not seek help, and one goal is to educate women about the options for treatment.

In the United States, Mirena is an attractive birth control option for women who have at least one child and are looking for convenient, long-term birth control. Under the Affordable Care Act, most insurance plans offer Mirena and other contraceptive options with no cost to the patient.

Mirena’s manufacturer, Bayer, recently released a new hormonal IUD called Skyla. Unlike Mirena, the new IUD is intended for use by women who have not yet had children and is effective for 3 years, two years less than Mirena.

The FDA first approved Mirena in 2000 and then in 2009 to treat heavy periods in women who already use IUD birth control. Though, in an editorial that accompanies the ECLIPSE study, Dr. Eve Espey of the University of New Mexico says: “The data from the [current study] support broadening its approval to include menorrhagia generally, whether or not contraception is needed.”

Mirena Side Effects Lead to Lawsuits

These studies and others conducted on Mirena have shown the IUD to be convenient and effective in preventing pregnancy and treating heavy periods. Unfortunately, Mirena has also been shown to have a number of side effects, some serious.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received more than 45,000 reports of adverse events related to Mirena. One of the most dangerous side effects is the potential for the IUD to migrate out of the uterus. Device dislocation occurred in more than 5,000 cases, and the device migrated out of the uterus in nearly 1,500 cases, leading to hospitalization and surgery in some cases.

Perforation of the uterus occurred in a number of Mirena users, and these women are now filing lawsuits claiming Bayer failed to warn them of the side effects and that the product is defective. Legal experts estimate that hundreds more cases may follow.

Bayer petitioned for consolidation of the cases in New Jersey Supreme Court, but the request was denied in January.

Michelle Llamas, Senior Content Writer
Written By Michelle Llamas Senior Writer

Michelle Llamas has been writing articles and producing podcasts about drugs, medical devices and the FDA for nearly a decade. She focuses on various medical conditions, health policy, COVID-19, LGBTQ health, mental health and women’s health issues. Michelle collaborates with experts, including board-certified doctors, patients and advocates, to provide trusted health information to the public. Some of her qualifications include:

  • Member of American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) and former Engage Committee and Membership Committee member
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health Literacy certificates
  • Original works published or cited in The Lancet, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and the Journal for Palliative Medicine

1 Cited Research Article writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012, September 27). Preventative services covered under the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from
View All Sources
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

Drugwatch's trusted legal partners support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our partners page.

(888) 645-1617