Not Accepting Cases

Paxil Lawsuits

Taking the prescription antidepressant Paxil during pregnancy can result in autism and birth defects. The drug is also linked to an increased risk of suicide in adolescents and withdrawal symptoms. This led to a number of lawsuits and settlements against drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline.

Approximately 5,000 people in the U.S. have filed lawsuits against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) since Paxil, the brand-name of the drug paroxetine, became available in 1992. Some of these claims were class-action suits. Cases alleged Paxil led to birth defects, withdrawal symptoms, or suicides.

In October 2009, the first birth defect case against the drug manufacturer went to trial. A Philadelphia jury awarded $2.5 million to 3-year-old Lyam Kilker, who was born with severe heart malformations as a result of his mother’s use of Paxil for mild anxiety while she was pregnant.

The jury found that GSK “negligently failed to warn” the doctor treating Kilker’s mother, Michelle David, about Paxil’s risks and that the drug was a “factual cause” of her son’s heart defects.

David had taken Paxil prior to Dec. 8, 2005, when the FDA informed physicians that the drug might contribute to heart defects in infants when taken during the first trimester. Because of these findings, the FDA required GSK to update the pregnancy warning on Paxil’s label to “Category D,” which signifies a positive evidentiary risk to fetal health.

Fact
By July 2010, GSK had settled approximately 800 Paxil birth defect lawsuits at a cost of $1.14 billion, with an average payout of $1.2 million to families of affected children.

GSK Agrees to Record Settlement in Fraud Case

In the largest pharmaceutical settlement in the nation’s history, GSK in 2012 agreed to plead guilty and pay $3 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability for promoting Paxil and other prescription drugs for unapproved uses and failing to report safety data about the medications.

Liability was established under the False Claims Act, also called the “Lincoln Law,” when four GSK employees tipped off the government about a range of improper practices between the late 1990s and mid-2000s.

“Today’s multi-billion dollar settlement is unprecedented in both size and scope. It underscores the Administration’s firm commitment to protecting the American people and holding accountable those who commit health care fraud.”

Source: James M. Cole, Deputy Attorney General

“At every level, we are determined to stop practices that jeopardize patients’ health, harm taxpayers, and violate the public trust — and this historic action is a clear warning to any company that chooses to break the law,” James M. Cole, deputy attorney general, said in the U.S. Department of Justice announcement of the settlement.

Criminal counts included misbranding Paxil and Wellbutrin, another antidepressant, into interstate commerce. GSK also agreed to plead guilty to a criminal charge of failing to report safety data about the company’s popular diabetes drug, Avandia, to the FDA.

Prosecutors said GSK illegally marketed Paxil to children, including helping to publish a medical journal article that misreported data from a clinical trial. The drug maker also attempted to bribe doctors to prescribe the antidepressant to children as an off-label treatment for depression and anxiety.

Paxil belongs to a class of antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). All SSRIs now carry FDA black box warnings for an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children and adolescents who take the drugs.

According to the complaint filed by the United States, GSK tried to win over doctors by offering spa treatments, hunting excursions and trips to Bermuda and Jamaica.

GSK is also charged with illegally marketing Wellbutrin for off-label uses, including weight loss and sexual dysfunction.

Birth Defect Cases Pending After $1.14 Billion Settlement

Kilker’s case set the stage for more Paxil-related birth defect lawsuits. The majority of claims ended up consolidated in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, where the 800 cases settled in 2010.

GSK officials confirmed to Bloomberg that the company had set aside $2.4 billion to resolve litigation over Paxil and its diabetes drug, Avandia. The company refused to comment on the terms of the settlements, but Bloomberg reported that the birth defects settlements brought GSK’s total to more than $2 billion to resolve Paxil lawsuits alone.

Although the settlement took care of the majority of these claims, around 100 lawsuits remained pending in Philadelphia for several years, with many of the remaining cases eventually decentralized.

Judge Tosses Mass Tort Birth Defect Lawsuit

In April 2016, Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Kenneth Powell dismissed a cardiac birth defect suit against GSK mid-trial for lack of adequate evidence by the plaintiffs. It was the first of nine similar cases queued for trial.

The case was brought by plaintiffs Baden Rader and his mother, Elisabeth Balser, who allege GSK did not provide adequate warning of Paxil’s birth defect risks during her pregnancy. Rader was born with Tetralogy of Fallot, a rare congenital birth defect that usually involves four abnormalities in the heart.

Paxil carried a milder pregnancy warning (category C) at the time Balser was prescribed the antidepressant in 2003.

Because of the lack of substantial evidence, Powell granted compulsory nonsuit, a court decision that their case could not proceed to trial, to Rader and Balser’s case against GSK.

In a written opinion issued in February 2017, Powell explained his bench ruling, calling the grant of nonsuit “an unfortunate, but absolute, necessity” because of an omitted witness question. Powell noted the plaintiffs’ counsel failed to ask Dr. Robert Kiehn, the physician who prescribed Paxil to Balser, if Kiehn would have still prescribed the drug if he’d known at the time about the potential birth defect risk.

“This failure painted the court, and the plaintiffs, into an unfortunate corner,” Powell wrote. “Because the plaintiffs did not ask these questions, the jury could do no better than guess as to whether the additional information would have caused Dr. [Robert] Kiehn not to prescribe Paxil in this instance.”

The plaintiffs are appealing Powell’s decision to the state Superior Court based on an alleged 11 points of error in the ruling. On April 21, 2016, Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Arnold New agreed to pause the consolidated Paxil litigation program until a final conclusion is reached in the case.

$6.2 Million Settlement Reached in Canadian Class Action

In February 2017, GSK announced that a settlement had been reached in a class action lawsuit filed by a Vancouver, Canada, firm that involves 50 mothers and their children.

GSK agreed to a $6.2 million settlement but refused to admit any liability or wrongdoing, saying it agreed to the settlement to “avoid the time and expense associated with the trial and the subsequent steps in the class-action proceeding.”

British Columbia resident Faith Gibson was the representative plaintiff in the suit. Gibson’s daughter, Meah Bartram, was born with a hole in her heart in 2005.

The law firm that handled the case says as many as 200 children in Canada could benefit from the settlement.

Withdrawal Symptom Litigation

Withdrawal syndrome is listed in Paxil’s label as a possible adverse effect.

Although Paxil is not addictive, several studies have shown discontinuation reactions, including dizziness, numbness, paraesthesia, and electric shock-like sensations, upon quitting SSRIs.

According to a study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, “these symptoms occurred significantly more frequently in patients who had been treated either with one of the shorter half-life SSRIs, fluvoxamine or paroxetine (17.2 percent), or with clomipramine (30.8 percent), than in patients taking one of the SSRIs with longer half-life metabolites, sertraline or fluoxetine (1.5 percent).”

GSK has settled thousands of lawsuits related to these issues. All cases were settled out of court with no jury awards given.

In 2006, federal lawsuits that had been consolidated in the Central District of California closed in settlement, with 1,574 plaintiffs paid an average of about $50,000 per case. Ultimately, GSK would resolve approximately 3,200 claims linking Paxil to withdrawal symptoms for a total of $160 million.

In 2004, the FDA found an increased risk of suicide among children and adolescents taking Paxil. The same year, New York attorney general accused GSK of hiding information about such risks associated with the antidepressant drug.

While there is no history of mass tort filings related to Paxil’s suicide connection, numerous cases have been tried or settled on a case-by-case basis.

GSK paid $390 million for suicides or attempted suicides said to be linked to the drug, according to Bloomberg.

Few cases related to suicide are still being filed today.

Widow of Chicago Attorney Awarded $3 Million in Paxil Suicide Case

The most recent Paxil suicide case involved former corporate lawyer Stewart Dolin, who was struck and killed by a Chicago Transit Authority train on July 15, 2010, while taking a generic version of Paxil.

His death was quickly ruled a suicide, but Dolin’s widow claimed it was caused by an adverse reaction to the antidepressant. The widow, Wendy Dolin, sought $12 million for her husband’s death in a trial that began in March 2017.

“This for me has not just been about the money. This has always been about awareness to a health issue, and the public has to be aware of this.”

Source: Wendy Dolin told the Chicago Tribune

On April 20, 2017, an Illinois federal jury found GSK liable for Stewart Dolin’s death and ordered the pharmaceutical company to pay $3 million to Wendy Dolin.

In the trial, Dolin’s lawyers claimed GSK knew about the increased suicide risks in adult Paxil patients before the drug went on the market and it hid the dangerous effect from the FDA and prescribing physicians.

“The kinds of risk we’re talking about right from the start are multiples of what is required to be reported under the law,” David Rapoport, one of Dolin’s attorneys, told the jury in a Chicago federal court.

GSK’s defense team claimed it was Dolin’s depression and job security with Chicago law firm Reed Smith that led to him jumping in front of the commuter train. Dolin had become a partner at Reed Smith after his smaller firm was acquired by the international firm in 2007.

GSK also claimed it should not be held responsible since Dolin took a generic version of Paxil.

But Wendy Dolin’s suit argued — and the jury agreed — GSK was still responsible because the drugs are identical and have the same labeling.

“This for me has not just been about the money. This has always been about awareness to a health issue, and the public has to be aware of this,” Wendy Dolin told the Chicago Tribune following the verdict.

However, in August 2018, a U.S. appeals court tossed the $3 million verdict. A panel of three judges found GSK could not be held liable for the alleged injuries caused by a generic version. In September 2018, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied Dolin’s request for a new hearing.

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.

Matt Mauney
Written By Matt Mauney Writer

Matt Mauney is a writer and researcher for Drugwatch. He is an award-winning journalist with a decade of professional experience. He has a bachelor's degree in journalism from Georgia Southern University. He also has a double minor in public relations and broadcasting. Some of his qualifications include:

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention certificate in Health Writing
  • Personal experience with a family history of cancer
  • Work published on ChicagoTribune.com, LATimes.com and FoxSports.com
Edited By

16 Cited Research Articles

  1. Bloomberg. (2010, July 21). Glaxo to pay $1.14b over birth defect suits. Retrieved from  http://www.smh.com.au/world/glaxo-to-pay-114b-over-birth-defect-suits-20100720-10jok.html
  2. Bellon, T. (2018, August 22). U.S. appeals court says GSK cannot be sued over generic drug suicide. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-gsk-lawsuit/u-s-appeals-court-says-gsk-cannot-be-sued-over-generic-drug-suicide-idUSKCN1L72D1
  3. Brush, P. (2009, October 13). Philadelphia Jury Slaps GSK With $2.5M Paxil Verdict. Retrieved from  https://www.law360.com/articles/128037/philadelphia-jury-slaps-gsk-with-2-5m-paxil-verdict
  4. Corso, J. (2017, March 14). GSK Owes $12M To Widow of Reed Smith Atty, Jury Hears. Retrieved from  https://www.law360.com/articles/901837/gsk-owes-12m-to-widow-of-reed-smith-atty-jury-hears
  5. Coupland, N.J., Bell, C.J. & Potakar, J.P. (1996, October). Serotonin reuptake inhibitor withdrawal. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8889907/
  6. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2003, December 19). IN RE PAXIL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Retrieved from  http://www.leagle.com/decision/20031670296FSupp2d1374_11530/IN%20RE%20PAXIL%20PRODUCTS%20LIABILITY%20LITIGATION
  7. Lee, S. (2017, February 7). Pa. Judge Explains Bench Toss Of Paxil Birth Defect Suit. Retrieved from  https://www.law360.com/articles/889565/pa-judge-explains-bench-toss-of-paxil-birth-defect-suit
  8. Packel, D. (2016, April 27). Philly Paxil Litigation Paused During Fight Over Initial Case. Retrieved from  https://www.law360.com/articles/789683/philly-paxil-litigation-paused-during-fight-over-initial-case
  9. Steinberg, J. (2018, September 20). Attorney’s Widow Loses Bid for Redo of Ruling for GSK. Bloomberg Law. Retrieved from https://biglawbusiness.com/attorneys-widow-loses-bid-for-redo-of-ruling-for-gsk/
  10. Strom, R. (2017, March 19). Bad Drugs or Big Law Stress? Jury to Decide in Reed Smith Partner's Suicide. Retrieved from  http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202781576400/Bad-Drugs-or-Big-Law-Stress-Jury-to-Decide-in-Reed-Smith-Partners-Suicide
  11. The Canadian Press. (2017, March 1). $6.2M settlement reached over claim anti-depressant led to birth defects. Retrieved from  http://bc.ctvnews.ca/6-2m-settlement-reached-over-claim-anti-depressant-led-to-birth-defects-1.3306779
  12. Thomas, K. and Schmidt, M. (2012, July 2). Glaxo Agrees to Pay $3 Billion in Fraud Settlement. Retrieved from  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/business/glaxosmithkline-agrees-to-pay-3-billion-in-fraud-settlement.html
  13. U.S. Department of Justice. (2012, July 2). GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data. Retrieved from  https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty-and-pay-3-billion-resolve-fraud-allegations-and-failure-report
  14. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2016, October 6). LABEL: PAXIL- paroxetine hydrochloride tablet, film coated; PAXIL- paroxetine hydrochloride suspension. Retrieved from  https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=584ace29-6e40-432f-950f-ab7e98653d32
  15. Wong, G. (2017, April 21). $3 million awarded to widow who sued pharmaceutical firm over husband’s suicide. Retrieved from  http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-paxil-suicide-lawsuit-verdict-met-20170420-story.html
  16. Kelley, T. (2010, July 15). Glaxo Sees $2.4 Billion Legal Cost on Avandia, Paxil. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.drugwatch.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=285&action=edit
View All Sources
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with Wilson and Peterson, LLP or one of its trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

Wilson and Peterson, LLP funds Drugwatch because it supports the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices.

(888) 645-1617

To contact Drugwatch Managing Editor Kevin Connolly, call (855) 839-9780.