Accepting Cases

Talcum Powder Verdicts & Settlements

Juries have awarded billions in verdicts to people who say talcum powder caused mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. Manufacturers in lawsuits include Johnson & Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive and Vanderbilt Minerals. In April 2018, a jury awarded $117 million to one man who said Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder caused his mesothelioma. Three months later, a jury in St. Louis ordered J&J to pay $4.69 billion to 22 plaintiffs who blamed asbestos in talcum powder for ovarian cancer.

Are you suffering from serious side effects after talcum powder use?

If you were exposed to industrial talc or used cosmetic talcum powder and developed complications, you may be entitled to compensation.

Medically Reviewed

Board-certified physicians medically review Drugwatch content to ensure its accuracy and quality.

Drugwatch partners with Physicians’ Review Network Inc. to enlist specialists. PRN is a nationally recognized leader in providing independent medical reviews.

Reviewer specialties include internal medicine, gastroenterology, oncology, orthopedic surgery and psychiatry.

People suing talcum powder manufacturers claim exposure to talc gave them mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.

As of July 2018, juries ordered companies including Johnson & Johnson, Colgate-Palmolive and Vanderbilt Minerals to pay billions in talcum powder verdicts.

For example, juries have ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay more than $5 billion to ovarian cancer plaintiffs. Women in the lawsuits used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for decades.

In April 2018, a New Jersey jury found Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower led to one man’s mesothelioma. The jury awarded $117 million.

In July 2018, another jury in Missouri awarded $4.69 billion to 22 women with ovarian cancer.

Companies have also paid out some confidential settlements for mesothelioma.

According to the lawsuits, companies were aware of studies that link talcum powder to mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. But, Johnson & Johnson and other companies chose not to add warnings to the product labels.

Mesothelioma Verdicts and Settlements

Talc deposits used to mine talcum powder may also contain asbestos. Asbestos causes mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer that often results in death.

Are you suffering from mesothelioma after talcum powder use? Get a Free Case Review

Over the years, people have sued industrial talc suppliers and cosmetic companies, including J&J. Lawsuits claimed asbestos-tainted products caused mesothelioma.

Several of these lawsuits have ended in multimillion-dollar jury awards for the plaintiffs. There have also been a few confidential settlements.

Johnson & Johnson says its talcum powder has never contained asbestos.

Recent Talc and Mesothelioma Verdicts
$117 Million Verdict
In April 2018, a New Jersey jury awarded $117 million to banker Stephen Lanzo III and his wife. Lanzo sued Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier Imerys Talc. He said Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower led to his mesothelioma.
$22 Million Verdict
In December 2017, a California jury awarded Richard Booker over $22 million. Booker sued Dexter Midland Chemical Co., Walter N. Boysen Paint Co., Vanderbilt Minerals and Imerys Talc. He worked as a paint maker and claimed he was exposed to talc contaminated with asbestos. Booker died of mesothelioma in 2016.
$18 Million Verdict
In October 2016, a Los Angeles jury awarded Philip Depoian $18 million against talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels. Doctors diagnosed Depoian with mesothelioma in May 2015. Depoian’s lawsuit said he was exposed to asbestos in talcum powder at the barbershop where his father worked.
$13 Million Verdict
In May 2015, a jury awarded Judith Winkel $13 million. The case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount before a jury could decide on additional punitive damages. Winkel sued Colgate-Palmolive Co. Her lawsuit said the company’s Cashmere Bouquet product caused her mesothelioma. She regularly used the popular scented talcum powder from 1961 to 1976.

Confidential Settlements

In addition to jury verdicts, companies have paid plaintiffs and their families confidential settlements.

In March 2018, Vanderbilt Minerals reached a confidential settlement with Robert Lord. Lord worked with ceramic tiles in the 1970s he said contained talc with asbestos.

“The Company and its legal counsel believe that these cases are without merit and intend to challenge them vigorously.”

Source: Colgate-Palmolive March 2018 SEC filing

Ovarian Cancer Verdicts and Settlements

Doctor's Conclusion
Talc particles were found in Berg’s cancerous tissues. Doctors who examined her concluded talcum powder caused her cancer.

A federal jury found that Johnson & Johnson’s body powder products were a factor in Berg’s condition. But J&J was not part of a conspiracy, according to the jury, which concluded the company had no liability.

Since then, J&J has lost several ovarian cancer trials. It has also won and overturned some verdicts.

Recent Talc and Ovarian Cancer Verdicts
$4.69 Billion Verdict
In July 2018, a St. Louis jury awarded $4.69 billion in punitive and compensatory damages to 22 plaintiffs, including the families of six women who died before the six-week trial. The women’s attorney argued that asbestos in talcum powder caused the women’s ovarian cancer.
$417 Million Jury Verdict
The largest verdict came in the first California trial in August 2017 in the case of Eva Echeverria. The jury awarded her $417 million. Echeverria used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for more than 40 years. She died from ovarian cancer a month after winning the trial. But in October 2017, California Superior Court Judge Maren Nelson overturned the verdict. She said there was no convincing evidence J&J acted with malice. Echeverria’s lawyers are appealing that decision.
$110 Million Jury Verdict
In May 2017, a jury in St. Louis awarded $110 million in compensatory and punitive damages to Lois Slemp. Slemp alleged Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products caused her ovarian cancer. She claimed to have used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder for more than 40 years.
$72 Million Jury Verdict
Jacqueline Fox was the first woman to win an ovarian cancer verdict against J&J. Before she died, Fox stated that she used Johnson & Johnson products containing talcum powder for 35 years. In February 2016, a St. Louis jury awarded Fox’s family $72 million. “They could have at least put a warning label on the box but they didn’t. They did nothing.” Juror Jerome Kendrick told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch The verdict was overturned in October 2017. Plaintiffs intend to appeal this decision.
$70 Million Jury Verdict
In October 2016 jurors found in favor of Deborah Giannecchini. The jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay roughly $70 million. They ordered codefendant Imerys Talc America, Inc., to pay $2.5 million. Giannecchini had used Johnson & Johnson’s powder on her genitals for about 40 years. In 2016, her lawyers said she had an 80 percent chance of dying within the next two years.
Are you suffering from ovarian cancer after talcum powder use? Get a Free Case Review

J&J’s First Talc Trial Victory

Not all J&J talcum powder lawsuits ended in plaintiff victories. In March 2017, St. Louis jurors found in favor of Johnson & Johnson in the case of Nora Daniels.

Doctors diagnosed Daniels with ovarian cancer in 2013. She underwent a hysterectomy, and as part of her treatment, doctors removed her ovaries and fallopian tubes.

Attorneys for Johnson & Johnson argued that stronger studies disproved the results of the epidemiological studies.

Spilled talcum powder on dark surface
Although asbestos free, cases claim talcum powder still causes ovarian cancer

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.

Did you find Drugwatch helpful?

22 Cited Research Articles

  1. Colgate-Palmolive. (2018, April 27). SEC Filings 10-Q Quarterly Report. Retrieved from http://investor.colgatepalmolive.com/sec.cfm?view=all
  2. Pettersson, E. (2017, October 20). J&J Wins Reversal of $417 Million California Talc Verdict. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-20/j-j-wins-reversal-of-417-million-california-baby-powder-verdict
  3. Mihalich v. Johnson & Johnson, and John & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (2014, May 23). U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois. Case No. 3:14-cv-00600-MJR-SCW.
  4. Estrada v. Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (2014, April 28). U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California. Case No. 2:14-cv-01051-TLN-KJN.
  5. Berg v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. (2009, Dec. 4). U.S. District Court, District of South Dakota, Southern Division. Case No. 4:09-cv-04179-KES.
  6. Cramer, D., Welch, W., Scully R. and Wojciechowski, C. (1982, July 15). Ovarian cancer and talc: a case-control study. PubMed. Abstract. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7083145#
  7. Terry, K., et al. (2013, August). Genital powder use and risk of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 8,525 cases and 9,859 controls. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766843/
  8. Huncharek, M., Geschwind, J., Kupelnick, B. (2003, March-April). Perineal application of cosmetic talc and risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta¬analysis of 11,933 subjects from sixteen observational studies. Abstract. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12820486
  9. The Associated Press. (2013, Oct. 3). Jury Ties J&J Talc Powder to Ovarian Cancer. Retrieved from https://www.dddmag.com/news/2013/10/jury-ties-jj-talc-powder-ovarian-cancer
  10. Talarico, G. et al. (2016, December 12). Admissibility of Expert Witnesses in Talc Litigation. Retrieved from http://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202775325174/Admissibility-of-Expert-Witnesses-in-Talc-Litigation
  11. Siegel, D. (2017, February 24). Plaintiff Experts Endure Withering Cross-Examination By Johnson & Johnson As Talc Powder Trial Continues. Retrieved from http://blog.cvn.com/plaintiff-experts-endure-withering-cross-examination-by-johnson-johnson-as-talc-powder-trial-continues
  12. Siegel, D. (2016, April 11). CVN To Webcast 2nd J&J Talcum Powder Cancer Trial After Landmark $72M Verdict. Retrieved from http://blog.cvn.com/cvn-to-webcast-2nd-jj-talcum-powder-cancer-trial-after-landmark-72m-verdict
  13. Wang, Y. (2016, February 24). Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $72 million in suit linking talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/24/johnson-johnson-ordered-to-pay-72m-in-suit-linking-talcum-powder-to-ovarian-cancer/?utm_term=.3b7aad7bbe19
  14. Dye, J. (2016, May 3). Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $55 mln in talc-powder trial. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-talc-verdict-idUSKCN0XT20L
  15. Raymond, N. (2017, May 4). J&J ordered to pay $110 million in U.S. talc-powder trial. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-cancer-lawsuit-idUSKBN18100F
  16. Salter, J. (2017, June 20). High Court ruling may hurt claims of talc link to cancer. Retrieved from http://www.stltoday.com/news/high-court-ruling-may-hurt-claims-of-talc-link-to/article_c62c5dee-eea9-59ab-8857-4b97bdc2bfe8.html
  17. Goodrich, Carol. (2017, May 4). Our Statement on Recent Talc Verdict. Retrieved from https://www.jnj.com/our-company/statement-on-recent-talc-verdict
  18. Hiltzik, Michael. (2017, July 8). Is junk science about to enter an L.A. courtroom in a lawsuit over ovarian cancer? Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-talc-cancer-20170707-story.html
  19. Siegel, Daniel. (2017, July 10). J&J's Talc Supplier Escapes Cancer Trial. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/articles/942915/j-j-s-talc-supplier-escapes-cancer-trial-
  20. Harrismartin.com. (2017, July 11). Calif. Talcum Powder Judge Awards Summary Judgment to Imerys Talc in First Case Set for Trial. Retrieved from https://harrismartin.com/article/22477/calif-talcum-powder-judge-awards-summary-judgment-to-imerys-talc-in-first-case-set-for-trial/
  21. Crisco, A. (2017, March 3). BREAKING: Johnson & Johnson Cleared in Talcum Powder-Cancer Trial. Retrieved from http://blog.cvn.com/breaking-johnson-johnson-cleared-in-talcum-powder-cancer-trial
  22. Raymond, N. (2017, June 20). U.S. Supreme Court ruling threatens massive talc litigation against J&J. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-cancer-lawsuit-idUSKBN19B3AV
View All Sources
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with Wilson and Peterson, LLP or one of its trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

Wilson and Peterson, LLP funds Drugwatch because it supports the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices.

(855) 547-5876

To contact Drugwatch Managing Editor Kevin Connolly, call (855) 839-9780.