GranuFlo and NaturaLyte Lawsuits

Granuflo and Naturalyte are acid concentrates used in dialysis solutions and manufactured by the world’s largest dialysis provider, Fresenius Medical Care. But an internal company memo pointed to Fresenius’ knowledge of a defect that led to patient injuries, including sudden cardiac arrest and death. Patients and their loved ones filed lawsuits against the company alleging fraud and negligence.

Last Modified: April 26, 2024
Fact Checked
Legally Reviewed

Drugwatch.com content is legally reviewed for accuracy and quality.

Examples of trusted legal reviewers include qualified mass torts lawyers and certified paralegals.

Drugwatch.com writers gather lawsuit information by studying court records, watching lawsuit proceedings and speaking with experienced attorneys.

Why Trust DrugWatch?

Drugwatch.com has been empowering patients for more than a decade

Drugwatch.com has provided reliable, trusted information about medications, medical devices and general health since 2008. We’ve also connected thousands of people injured by drugs and medical devices with top-ranked national law firms to take action against negligent corporations.

Our team includes experienced medical writers, award-winning journalists, researchers and certified medical and legal experts. Drugwatch.com is HONCode (Health On the Net Foundation) certified. This means the high-quality information we provide comes from credible sources, such as peer-reviewed medical journals and expert interviews.

The information on Drugwatch.com has been medically and legally reviewed by more than 30 expert contributors, including doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, patient advocates and other health care professionals. Our writers are members of professional associations, including American Medical Writers Association, American Bar Association, The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates and International Society for Medical Publication Professionals.

About Drugwatch.com

  • Assisting patients and their families since 2008.
  • Helped more than 12,000 people find legal help.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed medical and legal information site.
Learn More About Us

Testimonials

"Drugwatch opened my eyes to the realities of big pharmacy. Having a family member with major depression and anxiety, I was looking for information on her medications. I found information that was very helpful, that her psychiatrist never told her."
Marianne Zahren Patient’s Family Member
  • Google Business Rating
  • BBB A+ Rating Logo

GranuFlo and NaturaLyte Lawsuit Updates

In October 2023, the last cases in the Granuflo and NaturaLyte MDL in Massachusetts were resolved, and the MDL was closed that same month. Many lawyers are no longer taking cases. Fresenius had offered a $250 million settlement in 2016.

  • October 2023:
    The last of the cases in the MDL are resolved and the MDL is closed.
  • September 2023:
    All MDL cases are resolved, but the MDL remains open.
  • June 2023:
    Only 17 active cases are left open in the MDL, out of 4,516 originally filed.
  • July 2018:
    Courts in Denver award $383.5 million to the families of three patients who died from cardiac arrest after GranuFlo treatment. But this case was a malpractice case against the dialysis provider DaVita and not Fresenius.
  • March 2017:
    Fresenius Medical Care wins the first bellwether trial filed by plaintiffs. A jury in Massachusetts determined the plaintiffs didn’t prove that using Naturalyte in hemodialysis treatments was the “proximate cause” of a man’s death.
  • February 2016:
    Fresenius Medical Care reaches a $250 million settlement with most of the plaintiffs in the MDL. A small group of plaintiffs decline the settlement.
  • March 2013:
    The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transfers a handful of cases to multidistrict litigation in Massachusetts.
Show More

More than 4,500 lawsuits were included in the MDL at one time. Patients sued Fresenius, alleging injuries and/or death as a result of the company’s purported fraud, negligence and misrepresentation.

Why Did People File GranuFlo and NaturaLyte Lawsuits?

People began filing GranuFlo and NaturaLyte lawsuits after an internal company memo anonymously shared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2012 surfaced insinuating that Fresenius knew about risks associated with the dialysis products and failed to share that information with the public. The memo advised the company’s own physicians of an increased risk of cardiac arrest in patients due to metabolic alkalosis (too much bicarbonate — or carbon dioxide — in the blood) because of the improper use and dosing of Granuflo and Naturalyte in dialysis treatments.

The memo followed a study Fresenius conducted in its facilities between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2010. The study identified 941 patients in 667 Fresenius facilities who experienced cardiopulmonary arrests within the facilities.

DID YOU KNOW
An internal company memo anonymously shared with the FDA in 2012 led many injured patients to believe that Fresenius had prior knowledge of risks associated with the use of its dialysis products.

The results showed that hemodialysis patients were up to six times more likely to be at risk of cardiopulmonary arrest if they had elevated pre-dialysis bicarbonate levels. This conclusion caused Fresenius to research the issue of bicarbonate overdose and resulting metabolic alkalosis following dialysis treatments. This was done “too late,” according to injured plaintiffs.

The company memo was internally distributed on Nov. 4, 2011, about four to five months prior to it coming to the attention of the FDA and other dialysis centers using the company’s products. A Class I recall (the most serious type of recall as classified by the FDA) followed for all lots of Granuflo acid concentrate, with the FDA determining that the company violated regulations regarding false and misleading labeling by not including such relevant information.

Injuries in GranuFlo and NaturaLyte Lawsuits

Injuries in GranuFlo and NaturaLyte lawsuits claim the dialysis chemicals caused injuries, from irregular levels of electrolytes in the blood to sudden heart attacks. Plaintiffs from across the country filed suits against Fresenius for injuries they incurred after using Granuflo and/or Naturalyte, or for injuries incurred by their loved ones that resulted in death.

Injuries alleged include:
  • Cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat)
  • High levels of carbon dioxide in the blood
  • Low oxygen in the blood
  • Low potassium
  • Metabolic alkalosis
  • Sudden cardiac arrest or other adverse cardiopulmonary events

Plaintiffs allege patients suffered or died as a result of the use of Granuflo and Naturalyte. The lawsuits allege that after using these products, patients experienced an unusually high level of bicarbonate in their blood and that this consequently increased their risk of sudden cardiac arrest or other cardiopulmonary injury.

Allegations against Fresenius:
  • Breach of express warranty (what a seller represents to a buyer)
  • Breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
  • Fraud
  • Loss of consortium (damages suffered by a spouse or family member of an injured person)
  • Negligence
  • Negligent design
  • Negligent failure to warn
  • Negligent misrepresentation
  • Survival action on behalf of the decedent’s estate
  • Strict liability (does not depend on negligence or intent to harm)
  • Violation of consumer protection laws
  • Wrongful death

They also assert that the injuries and deaths could have been prevented if Fresenius had adequately investigated and properly studied its products prior to marketing them for use in dialysis treatments. Furthermore, after learning about the risks, Fresenius concealed the information from the medical community rather than ensuring patients’ safety.

People Who Filed Lawsuits

All of the cases against Fresenius contain some common factual questions, including whether the products were defectively manufactured, whether Fresenius knew or should have known about the risks to patients as a result of the defect, and whether Fresenius provided adequate instructions and warnings in order to prevent or minimize such risks.

Steven Roberts

Steven Roberts alleged he experienced a stroke following the use of Granuflo. In January 2012, Roberts received his dialysis treatment at Davita Greer Kidney Center.

DID YOU KNOW
Within two hours of receiving his treatment, Roberts claimed he exhibited symptoms of dizziness, disorientation, lack of focus, slurred speech, impaired motor functions and difficulty walking.

His wife took him to the hospital where he was diagnosed with a brain aneurysm. Roberts spent approximately one week in the intensive care unit. He said he still experiences “serious impacts” as a result of an aneurysm allegedly brought on by Fresenius’ defective product.

Roberts continues to suffer from neck pains, difficulty speaking, and weakness and motor impairment on his left side. He also experiences diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, irritability and difficulty breathing as a result of an aneurysm and associated complications.

He claimed that he was never warned of the “significant and serious risks” associated with the use of Granuflo and/or Naturalyte in his dialysis treatments.

Arthurine Williams

Alabama resident Arthurine Williams filed a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of her deceased husband, Johnny Williams. Williams alleged that her husband experienced a fatal heart attack from using Fresnius’ dialysis products.

Williams’ complaint said that her husband was prescribed Granuflo and Naturalyte three times a week beginning in June 2010. On July 28, 2010, he received a hemodialysis treatment at a DaVita center in Ensley, Alabama. Granuflo was used in his treatment.

DID YOU KNOW
Arthurine Williams claimed that after the use of the product and following his dialysis treatment, Johnny Williams suffered a heart attack and died the following day.

Williams also claimed that her husband relied upon “the misrepresentations and actions” of Fresenius “in so far as that the hemodialysis products he was being provided were safe and effective for use in his treatments.”

Betty Lemmond

Betty Lemmond filed a lawsuit on behalf of her deceased husband, Dizzy Dean Lemmond, and his estate. He also suffered a heart attack resulting in his death after using one of Fresenius’ dialysis products.

Lemmond’s complaint alleged that on Aug. 11, 2010, her husband received a hemodialysis treatment at a DaVita center in Sylacauga, Alabama. He was also provided Granuflo during the treatment. He experienced a sudden heart attack following his treatment and died the same day.

Waddell Bishop

In 2012, Waddell Bishop sued Fresenius after his mother, Frances Carol Bishop, died following the use of Granuflo and Naturalyte. Bishop claimed that his mother suffered “an adverse cardiovascular event” on Sept. 16, 2010, after receiving a dialysis treatment that used Fresenius’ dialysis products.

Bishop’s complaint alleged that his mother and her health care providers were “not aware and through diligent effort not able to discover the risk of serious injury and/or death associated with and/or caused by using Granuflo and/or Naturalyte.”

The lawsuit further alleged that her “injuries and damages directly resulted from using Granuflo and/or Naturalyte,” and that Fresenius “knew or should have known, or could have learned through reasonable diligence that Granuflo and/or Naturalyte caused and/or was associated with an increased risk of death and serious injuries.”

Fresenius’ $250 Million GranuFlo and NaturaLyte Settlement

In February 2016, Fresenius requested a stay (halt of proceedings) in the MDL to propose a $250 million settlement to the more than 4,000 plaintiffs awaiting trial. The first two bellwether trials scheduled to take place in early 2016 were pushed back as a result of the pending settlement.

FRESENIUS REQUIREMENTS
Fresenius needed 97% of plaintiffs to agree to the settlement for it to move forward.

Fresenius has not disclosed how many cases the settlement will include. According to its 2022 annual report, the company’s insurer, AIG, agreed to fund the settlement in 2017. However, AIG and Fresenius sued each other to recover costs and fees related to the settlement. Both of those motions were denied and the litigation is at an impasse.

Fresenius Wins First State Jury Trial

The settlement proposal followed a win for Fresenius in the first case to go to trial in a Massachusetts state court. The jury found that while Fresenius was negligent in not immediately distributing the information in its internal company memo to the general medical community and the public at large, the patient’s death could not be attributed to Granuflo.

In 2016, a spokesperson for Fresnius, Kent Jarrell, stated to The New York Times that “the initial internal memo was actually incorrect and contradicted by further careful analysis.” He also said the warning language that was added to labeling for Granuflo in 2012 was later removed.

Jarrell said the settlement following their initial win was not an admission of wrongdoing but just a way to put an end to the litigation.

First Bellwether Trial Ends in Defense Verdict

The first bellwether trial to be heard in the Fresenius litigation took place in February 2017. A trial that began on Feb. 8 ended on March 3 when a Massachusetts federal jury returned a verdict in favor of Fresenius. Plaintiff Florella Dial pressed forward with the bellwether trial after opting out of the $250 million settlement proposed by Fresenius.

Judge Douglas Woodlock also found in favor of Fresenius on a claim under North Carolina law for unfair and deceptive trade practices. Dial’s husband, Carley Dial, was treated at a Fresenius clinic in 2012. Dial alleged her husband died of cardiac arrest following a dialysis session using Granuflo and/or Naturalyte.

Dial alleged that Fresenius failed to provide adequate warnings and instructions for its dialysis product, thereby putting patients at risk. She also alleged that Fresenius’ own physicians were confused by the company’s failure to warn users about the proper handling of its products and the risks involved.

The plaintiff filed an appeal in 2017, but both parties agreed to stay the trial pending settlement negotiations. Dial consequently withdrew her appeal.

Kentucky Attorney General Sues Fresenius

In 2016, then Kentucky Attorney General Andy Beshear filed a public interest lawsuit on behalf of the Kentucky Medicaid program against Fresenius. The complaint requested recovery of damages, statutory civil penalties and injunctive (compelling or restraining a person or entity from action) relief.

Beshear alleged “the Defendants knew or should have known of the increased risk of metabolic alkalosis attributed to the use of Granuflo.” It also alleged that Fresenius violated Medicaid guidelines by failing to warn clinics and doctors of the risk.

Fresenius offered $10.3 million to settle allegations in 2019, according to the law firm Beasley Allen. Five million was returned to Kentucky Medicaid.

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.