Johnson & Johnson’s talc supplier has settled talcum powder lawsuits brought by 22 women. The complaints allege talcum powder caused ovarian cancer.
Imerys Talc America will pay the women at least $5 million, according to Bloomberg. The news outlet cites two people familiar with the matter. The remaining terms of the settlement were not disclosed
The settlement came just before jury selection began Monday in the trial involving claims by all 22 women. The women say using Johnson & Johnson consumer talc products caused their ovarian cancer.
The St. Louis trial involves lead plaintiff Gail Lucile Ingham of O’Fallon, Missouri. The parties expect opening statements Wednesday. The trial is expected to last until the middle of July.
Imerys emailed a statement to Drugwatch on Monday confirming the settlement.
“Imerys has reached a resolution with the 22 Ingham plaintiffs and is being dismissed from the action,” the statement said. It did not give further details.
Johnson & Johnson faces more than 9,000 talcum powder lawsuits. The number comes from a recent filing with the U.S. Securitimentes and Exchange Commission.
Nearly 7,000 of the cases are consolidated in federal court in New Jersey under a multidistrict litigation (MDL). The remaining cases are in state courts, primarily in Missouri, New Jersey and California.
The vast majority of cases relate to claims that talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer. That includes all the cases in the MDL.
A small, but growing, number of lawsuits assert that talcum powder contains asbestos. People who say using talcum powder products caused mesothelioma are filing those lawsuits. Mesothelioma is a rare, deadly cancer caused by exposure to asbestos.
Trials involving both types of cancer have ended in mixed results. Some juries have handed up verdicts in favor of the powder makers. Others have rendered multi-million-dollar verdicts for consumers.
A jury in New Jersey awarded Stephen Lanzo $117 million in his mesothelioma case. Imerys said it would appeal.
“While ITA deeply sympathizes with those affected by all forms of cancer, this decision is inconsistent with a great deal of science establishing the safety of talc, including a recently published study of workers who mined and milled talc,” Imerys Talc America said in a statement. “It is also inconsistent with previous juries addressing the same issues, which did not find ITA’s products contained asbestos or caused any disease.”
Imerys’ portion of that award was $36.1 million. The jury apportioned the rest to Johnson & Johnson.
Until now, all trials involving Johnson & Johnson powders have included Imerys as a defendant. With the settlement, Johnson & Johnson will go it alone.
“Rather than warn consumers, Johnson & Johnson has worked with industry lobbyists to deny this evidence and the more than 20 other credible clinical studies that have found an increased risk of ovarian cancer among women who use talc for feminine hygiene,” said plaintiffs’ law firm, Lanier Law Firm, in a news release. “Those studies include reports by the United States Toxicology Program and the World Health Organization classifying talc as a human carcinogen.”
Johnson & Johnson maintains that its talc products are safe. The company says the powders have undergone rigorous testing. Among other things, Johnson & Johnson attorneys point out that the Food and Drug Administration does not require warnings on talcum powder.
Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Drugwatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.(855) 547-5876