Microbial contamination in samples of the blockbuster blood thinner Xarelto – used to prevent blood clots and strokes – caused Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen unit to recall 13,500 bottles of the drug this week. The recall comes shortly after several new lawsuits filed by patients who claim the drug caused uncontrollable bleeding that led to deaths.
Janssen said the contaminated bottles came from the its Puerto Rico plant – one of four J&J committed to pumping $225 million into for upgrades. The company assured customers that their supply of the blood thinner will not be impacted.
“We received a complaint involving one bottle of a XARELTO sample, and therefore are recalling the entire lot,” the company said in an email to industry news site Fierce Pharma.
This is not the first problem the company has had with contamination. Last year, it recalled 5,000 vials of Risperdal Consta, a popular antipsychotic, after it received complaints about mold in the medicine.
Both Risperdal and Xarelto are subjects of unrelated lawsuits. Boys and young men said they developed breasts, a disturbing side effect called gynecomastia, after taking the drug.
Xarelto brings millions of dollars to J&J despite side effects and contamination issues. Sales of the drug climbed 68 percent from last year, earning J&J and its partner Bayer Pharmaceuticals over $400 million in the third quarter of this year, Fierce Pharma reports. The drug has generated more than $1 billion in revenue since its release.
Contamination issues aren’t the only issues facing J&J and Bayer’s blood thinner. The companies face a number of lawsuits filed by families of patients who blame the bleeding caused by the drug for the death of loved ones.
Doctors are forced to find a work around to save patients who end up in the ER with stomach and brain bleeds, and patients suffer complications, including death.
J&J’s Janssen marketed Xarelto as superior to decades-old blood thinner Coumadin (warfarin). Unlike Coumadin, the new drug – like its cousin Pradaxa – does not require blood tests for dosing and has no dietary restrictions, but does not have an antidote. The promise of effective and convenient medication led doctors to give millions of prescriptions to patients, a number of these patients suffered bleeds.
Another drugmaker, Portola, developed a possible antidote for Factor Xa drugs like Xarelto and Eliquis. This month, Seeking Alpha reported the antidote passed Phase III trials. Companies hope the antidote helps quell the tide of lawsuits. Though, the antidote may be too late for the millions of people who already take the drug.
Experts speculate whether the Xarelto bleeding lawsuits may be consolidated into a mass tort or multidistrict litigation (MDL).
“Instead of controlling bleeding, which is what it claims to do, it actually makes bleeding worse,” attorney Marc Bern told The Legal Intelligencer. “We believe Xarelto is headed in the same direction of Pradaxa.”
Pradaxa, a blood thinner released a couple years before Xarelto that also lacks an antidote. Earlier this year, Boehringer Ingleheim settled thousands of Pradaxa claims for $650 million. Bern added, “[Xarelto] injuries seem to be a little worse than the Pradaxa injuries.”
“Defendants willfully, wantonly and with malice withheld the knowledge of increased risk if irreversible bleeds in users of Xarelto to prevent any chance of their product’s registrations being delayed or rejected by the FDA,” complaints allege. “While defendants enjoy great financial success from their expected blockbuster drug, Xarelto, they continue to place American citizens at risk of severe bleeds and death.”
Janssen replied that Xarelto is an important medication to reduce the risk of blood clots, the Legal Intelligencer reported.
“The risk of bleeding – a known side effect for all blood thinners – is clearly highlighted in the warnings and precautions sections of the Xarelto prescribing information,” the company said in an email. It made no mention of the lack of an antidote.
The Xarelto cases are still in their infancy, and lawyers say it is still too soon to tell how many will hit U.S. courts, but federal consolidation is not unlikely.
Drugwatch.com writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.
Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Drugwatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.(888) 645-1617