Home Hip Replacement Wright Medical

Wright Medical Hip Replacements: Failures, Recalls & Safety Concerns

Wright Medical hip implants faced serious safety concerns due to their metal-on-metal design. These implants released metal particles, leading to pain, tissue damage and early failure. Lawsuits and high revision surgery rates highlight the risks of Wright hip implants.

Last Modified: April 18, 2025
Fact Checked
Medically Reviewed

Board-certified physicians medically review Drugwatch.com content to ensure its accuracy and quality.

Drugwatch.com partners with Physicians’ Review Network Inc. to enlist specialists. PRN is a nationally recognized leader in providing independent medical reviews.

Reviewer specialties include internal medicine, gastroenterology, oncology, orthopedic surgery and psychiatry.

Why Trust DrugWatch?

Drugwatch.com has been empowering patients for more than a decade

Drugwatch.com has provided reliable, trusted information about medications, medical devices and general health since 2008. We’ve also connected thousands of people injured by drugs and medical devices with top-ranked national law firms to take action against negligent corporations.

Our team includes experienced medical writers, award-winning journalists, researchers and certified medical and legal experts. Drugwatch.com is HONCode (Health On the Net Foundation) certified. This means the high-quality information we provide comes from credible sources, such as peer-reviewed medical journals and expert interviews.

The information on Drugwatch.com has been medically and legally reviewed by more than 30 expert contributors, including doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, patient advocates and other health care professionals. Our writers are members of professional associations, including American Medical Writers Association, American Bar Association, The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates and International Society for Medical Publication Professionals.

About Drugwatch.com

  • Assisting patients and their families since 2008.
  • Helped more than 12,000 people find legal help.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed medical and legal information site.
Learn More About Us

Testimonials

"Drugwatch opened my eyes to the realities of big pharmacy. Having a family member with major depression and anxiety, I was looking for information on her medications. I found information that was very helpful, that her psychiatrist never told her."
Marianne Zahren Patient’s Family Member
  • Google Business Rating
  • BBB A+ Rating Logo

What Safety Issues Did Wright Medical Hip Replacement Patients Experience?

Wright Medical produced several metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implant components before eliminating the last of its hip implant business in 2016. Even after that, Wright Medical faced hip replacement lawsuits and other controversies surrounding its Conserve, Profemur and Dynasty MoM hip implant lines.

The Dangers of Wright Medical’s Metal-on-Metal Design

Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants, including those made by Wright Medical, raised serious health and safety concerns due to wear and corrosion issues.

Unlike other types of hip implants, MoM devices have metal parts that move against each other. This friction can cause tiny metal ions to enter the body. These particles could lead to tissue damage, bone loss and a type of metal poisoning called metallosis.

Over time, these issues can cause pain, loosen implants and make the devices fail sooner than expected, often requiring another surgery to fix them.

Problems With MoM Hips

Metal Wear and Corrosion
Movement causes metal ions — like cobalt and chromium — to enter the bloodstream.
Loosening and Early Failure
Soft tissue damage can weaken the implant’s stability.
Fractures
The weakening of bone around the implant increases fracture risks.
Adverse Tissue Reactions
Tissue and nerve damage can lead to severe complications.

These issues made MoM hips unsafe for many patients. Because doctors couldn’t predict who would react badly to the metal particles — and hip replacement complications were often severe — they largely stopped using MoM hip implants to protect patient health.

The Health Risks & High Revision Rates of Wright Medical Hip Implants

A 2016 study in The Open Orthopaedics Journal discovered high revision rates for Wright Medical’s Conserve metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants. The research raised concerns about the device’s safety.

Researchers reviewed 108 hip implants in 92 patients and discovered that nearly 1 in 5 Wright hip implants required revision surgery within 4.5 years.

What the Wright Medical Conserve Study Found
  • The 18.4% revision rate within 4.5 years was well above the generally acceptable rate of 6% after five years and 12% after 10 years.
  • Device loosening and pain were the most common reasons for failure.
  • Researchers found pseudotumors in four cases, but they did not confirm a direct link to implant failure.
  • Groin pain was a common early symptom of implant failure.

Due to these risks, the hospitals in the study stopped using Wright Medical’s Conserve MoM hip, contributing to the broader phaseout of MoM hip replacements.

Wright Hip Implant Regulatory Actions and Issues

Wright Medical’s hip implants — like the Conserve, Dynasty and Profemur — have faced safety and legal issues. Many patients suffered serious complications, leading to lawsuits and increased scrutiny from regulators.

While some implant devices received full FDA approval, others got clearance through the quicker “premarket submission” process called 510(k). This fast-track approach raised questions about their long-term safety. Medical devices approved through the 510(k) premarket submission route must show they are “substantially equivalent“ to a device already on the market.

Wright Medical Conserve System

The Conserve Plus Total Resurfacing Hip System received the FDA’s full premarket approval (PMA) in 2009. This approval indicated that it met strict safety and effectiveness standards.

Key Issues With the Conserve Hip Systems
  • Metal-on-metal design led to high levels of cobalt and chromium ion release, causing metallosis.
  • Lawsuit complaints claimed Wright marketed its Conserve components as much as three years before receiving official FDA clearance, citing an internal Wright letter. The lawsuit claimed Wright “knew [its action] was inappropriate and in violation of FDA requirements.”
  • A 2016 Open Orthopaedics Journal study involving 108 Wright Conserve MoM hip implants found that 18.4% of patients required additional surgery within about 4.5 years due to implant-related issues. Some also developed pseudotumors. These concerns led hospitals to discontinue using this type of implant.

Wright Medical Dynasty Total Hip Systems

A version of the Dynasty hip implant that combines metal parts with ceramic and plastic components is still available today. However, there were plenty of issues with the original metal-on-metal version.

Lawsuits claimed that Wright Medical advertised the Dynasty Total Hip Device for “young, very active patients” because it provided “a greater range of motion” without “wear-related concerns.” However, these implants had “dangerously high revision rates in women” and the potential for metallosis and other issues, according to court documents.

In addition, Wright recalled 900 Dynasty Biofoam Shells in 2012 due to issues with improper packaging, causing surgeons to “unintentionally implant” debris from packaging components into patients. These issues occasionally required revision surgery to remove particulate debris.

Key Issues With the Dynasty Hip Systems
  • Wright improperly packaged more than 900 Dynasty Biofoam Shell products, potentially leading to debris becoming embedded in patients’ bodies.

Wright Medical Profemur System

Clinical studies have linked Wright’s Profemur hip implants to catastrophic failures. A 2015 study in the journal Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research found the Profemur Z model had a 6% neck fracture rate within five years, while the Profemur E had a 9% loosening rate.

Key Issues With the Profemur System Hips
  • The same study found that exposure to metal debris caused tissue reactions and elevated metal ion levels. These issues required revision surgery in roughly 3% of people with Profemur implants in the study.
  • Men had a 3.6x higher risk of implant loosening with Profemur E implants.

These regulatory issues and complications contributed to Wright Medical’s extensive litigation and eventual financial settlements.

FDA Effectively Banned Metal-on-Metal Hips

In 2016, the FDA effectively ended the 510(k) fast-track approval method for MoM hips, though it still exists for some other medical devices. The FDA decided that all metal-on-metal total hip implants now needed special permission before gaining market approval. Companies had to show they were safe and worked correctly before advertising them.

Since no company was able to get this approval, metal-on-metal hip implants essentially vanished from the market in the United States. Today, there are only two FDA-approved options for MoM hip resurfacing procedures and no FDA-approved MoM hip replacement devices.

Wright Hip Lawsuits & Multimillion-Dollar Settlements

Wright Medical faced multiple lawsuits over its metal-on-metal hip implants, including the Conserve, Dynasty and Profemur systems. The legal actions focused on claims that Wright poorly designed and manufactured the devices, causing painful injuries and significant medical costs. As a result, Wright Medical faced mounting litigation in both federal and state courts, ultimately leading to substantial settlements.

A federal panel combined four Wright Conserve hip lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in 2012. MDLs combine several similar lawsuits into a single litigation to speed up the legal process. Eventually, there were 640 cases in this litigation (MDL-2329).

A California Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (JCCP) combined additional cases involving Conserve, Dynasty and Lineage implants that required revision surgery.

In 2016 and again in 2017, Wright Medical offered a pair of settlements to resolve its MoM hip cases in the MDL and JCCP.

Wright Medical Verdicts & Settlements:

  • 2012:
    The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created MDL-2329 for Wright Conserve hip implant lawsuits.
  • 2015:
    An Atlanta jury awarded an $11 million verdict to Robyn Christiansen in the first bellwether trial of the Conserve MDL. Bellwether trials are test cases to determine how future trials may go and encourage one side or the other to either drop their lawsuits or settle the cases.
  • 2016:
    Wright Medical paid $240 million to settle 1,292 cases over its Conserve, Dynasty and Lineage hip implants. This addressed most cases in the Conserve MDL and California Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding.
  • 2017:
    Wright reached an additional $89.75 million settlement for cases not covered in the initial 2016 settlement.
  • 2018:
    U.S. District Judge William Duffey closed MDL-2329.
Show More

These settlements compensated affected patients while closing ongoing litigation against Wright Medical. However, the lawsuits also highlighted the broader risks associated with metal-on-metal hip implants, prompting increased scrutiny of similar devices.

Wright Medical sold its hip and knee division to MicroPort Scientific in 2013 for $290 million. Wright merged with Tornier in 2015, acquiring another line of hip implant products. However, it divested its newly acquired large joint division in 2016, selling the line to Cornin Orthopaedics for $33 million.

What You Should Do if You Have a Wright Medical MoM Hip Implant

If you had hip replacement surgery before May 18, 2016, you might have a Wright Medical or other brand of metal-on-metal implant. Your doctor can confirm. Regular check-ups are important to catch potential issues early and avoid complications.

Steps to Take With a Wright Medical Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant

Monitoring symptoms and keeping up with regular doctor visits can help detect problems early, reducing the risk of serious health issues. If you experience pain or other unusual symptoms, seek medical advice right away.

Watch for Symptoms
Report pain, swelling, numbness, weakness or difficulty walking. Listen for clicking, grinding or popping sounds.
Keep Up With Check-Ups
Follow your surgeon’s recommended visit schedule and go more frequently if advised.
Request Testing if Needed
Blood tests check metal ion levels, and imaging scans assess implant stability.
Discuss Health Concerns
Tell your doctor about any new medical conditions or treatments.

If symptoms worsen, contact your surgeon immediately to prevent further problems.

Resources for Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Patients

Staying informed is key to managing your health with a metal-on-metal implant. Trusted organizations like the FDA and medical research centers provide up-to-date information on risks, safety recommendations and treatment options. These sources can help you make informed decisions about your care.

Helpful Online Resources for Wright Medical Metal-on-Metal Hip Patients
  • Arthritis Foundation: This online resource explains the risk factors and complications of implant failure.
  • FDA Patient Guide: This FDA guide covers risks, follow-ups and safety updates.
  • Mass General MoM Center: This medical center department specializes in diagnosis, treatment and research related to MoM implants.
  • Mayo Clinic Connect: This online patient community provides advice and support for people with metal-on-metal implants.

If you have concerns about your implant, don’t wait for symptoms to worsen. Talk to your doctor about testing options and possible next steps. By being proactive, you can protect your health and help ensure the best possible outcome for your hip implant.

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.