German manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim announced today that it will pay $650 million to settle all 4,000 state and federal lawsuits over its blood thinner Pradaxa (dabigatran). That amounts to an average of $162,500 for each claimant. The lawsuits state that Pradaxa can cause bleeding events that cannot be controlled and are sometimes fatal.
In 2011 alone, more than 540 patients lost their lives after using Pradaxa, according to FDA reports, and thousands of people reported serious side effects — surpassing all other monitored drugs for the year.
“We are pleased that today’s settlement will bring justice and financial assistance to those hurt while taking Pradaxa,” Mikal Watts, a member of the 27-lawyer Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, said in a statement. “We are proud of the settlement we have achieved, congratulate the company on doing the right thing, and look forward to distributing these funds to our clients as expeditiously as possible.”
When Pradaxa was approved in 2010, it was the only alternative to warfarin (also known as Coumadin), a decades-old drug used to prevent blood clots and strokes. While warfarin requires weekly exams and dietary restrictions, Pradaxa does not.
In 2012, Pradaxa sales hit $1.5 billion. The anticoagulant therapy market is estimated to bring in $10 billion a year in the United States alone.
All blood thinners increase the risk of bleeding. If warfarin patients experience a bleeding event, doctors can administer an antidote to stop the bleeding. With Pradaxa and the other new blood thinners, there is no antidote. Boehringer says an antidote is in development.
When Roy Heady of the Cookeville, Tennessee, area and thousands of other patients suffered bleeding events, it sounded the alarms for regulators.
Shortly after switching from Coumadin to Pradaxa, Heady was hospitalized for a hemorrhage. Although he was taken off of the medication, he still suffered from internal bleeding as a result of Pradaxa, according to his lawsuit.
“I thought it would lessen the headache of being on Coumadin,” Heady, a retired electrician, told USA Today for a 2012 story. “But it ended up creating more of a headache.”
Federal Pradaxa lawsuits were consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in August 2012, in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. Judge David. R. Herndon presided over the litigation. Consolidated state proceedings also existed in Connecticut, California, Delaware and Missouri, according to legal reports. Lawyers from each jurisdiction worked together to achieve this settlement with Boehringer.
In a statement released in February 2014, the company maintained: “We are certain that we can show in the legal cases that we have worked very carefully and responsibly in research, development and marketing of Pradaxa.”
In agreeing to the settlement, the company continued to deny wrongdoing.
“We continue to stand resolutely behind Pradaxa and believed from the outset that the plaintiffs’ claims lacked any merit,” Andreas Neumann, head of the Legal Department and general counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim worldwide, said in a statement today.
“Notwithstanding our strong belief that we would prevail in these lawsuits, this settlement allows our company to avoid the distraction and uncertainty of protracted litigation over years and years.”
Drugwatch.com writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.
Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Drugwatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.(888) 645-1617