Wright Medical Hip Implant Lawsuits

Wright Medical agreed to two settlements totaling $330 million to resolve hundreds of lawsuits over its hip-replacement implants. After the final settlement, a federal court closed the multidistrict litigation against Wright in June 2018. The company no longer makes hip implants.

This is an active lawsuit

See If You Qualify for a Hip Replacement Lawsuit

If you experienced serious complications from your hip replacement device, you may be entitled to compensation. Get a free case review.

  • A+BBB Rating
  • 4.9 StarGoogle Reviews

We value your privacy. By clicking REVIEW MY CASE, you agree to our privacy policy and disclaimer. After submitting, you will be contacted by one or more of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners (including autodialed and prerecorded calls or text/SMS messages). Msg. and data rates apply. Your consent to text messaging is not required for a case review and you may opt out of text messages at any time by texting STOP. This is legal advertising.

  • A+BBB Rating
  • 4.9 StarGoogle Reviews
Last Modified: February 1, 2024
Fact Checked
Medically Reviewed

Board-certified physicians medically review Drugwatch.com content to ensure its accuracy and quality.

Drugwatch.com partners with Physicians’ Review Network Inc. to enlist specialists. PRN is a nationally recognized leader in providing independent medical reviews.

Reviewer specialties include internal medicine, gastroenterology, oncology, orthopedic surgery and psychiatry.

Why Trust DrugWatch?

Drugwatch.com has been empowering patients for more than a decade

Drugwatch.com has provided reliable, trusted information about medications, medical devices and general health since 2008. We’ve also connected thousands of people injured by drugs and medical devices with top-ranked national law firms to take action against negligent corporations.

Our team includes experienced medical writers, award-winning journalists, researchers and certified medical and legal experts. Drugwatch.com is HONCode (Health On the Net Foundation) certified. This means the high-quality information we provide comes from credible sources, such as peer-reviewed medical journals and expert interviews.

The information on Drugwatch.com has been medically and legally reviewed by more than 30 expert contributors, including doctors, pharmacists, lawyers, patient advocates and other health care professionals. Our writers are members of professional associations, including American Medical Writers Association, American Bar Association, The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates and International Society for Medical Publication Professionals.

About Drugwatch.com

  • Assisting patients and their families since 2008.
  • Helped more than 12,000 people find legal help.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed medical and legal information site.
Learn More About Us


"Drugwatch opened my eyes to the realities of big pharmacy. Having a family member with major depression and anxiety, I was looking for information on her medications. I found information that was very helpful, that her psychiatrist never told her."
Marianne Zahren Patient’s Family Member
  • Google Business Rating
  • BBB A+ Rating Logo

Latest Updates in Wright Medical Hip Implant Lawsuits

Some lawyers are still accepting individual hip implant cases, but the multidistrict litigation is closed. After losing its first two bellwether test trials, Wright Medical offered to settle its remaining hip implant lawsuits. 

Wright Medical faced roughly 2,000 lawsuits after selling its hip implant manufacturing operations. A federal panel combined 640 of the lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation in Georgia. Others were combined in state courts.

  • June 2024: The MDL has already been closed for years, but some lawyers were still evaluating individual cases for potential settlement negotiations or to go to trial.
  • December 2023: Profemur brand artificial hip implants have broken apart at the dual modular “neck,” causing patients to suddenly lose their ability to walk or stand, according to a joint investigation by KFF Health and CBS News.
  • September 2019: Final settlement payments from Wright were supposed to be sent out.
  • July 2019: 73 lawsuits remained in the MDL.
  • June 2018: The court ordered the MDL closed.
  • October 2017: Wright agreed to settle all remaining hip-implant lawsuits against the company — about 600 cases — for $90 million. No additional lawsuits could be filed in the MDL.
  • November 2016: Wright settled more than 1,200 lawsuits for $240 million.

The second settlement in October 2017 covered plaintiffs who had not been allowed into the first settlement. This included people who filed lawsuits after the November 2016 agreement and those who had missed the deadline to file a lawsuit.

The 2017 settlement also applied to dozens of cases that were still pending in a Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding in California state court. No additional lawsuits could be added to the MDL after Oct. 18, 2017. Following the 2017 settlement, the court ordered the MDL closed in June 2018.

Wright Hip Implants Named in Lawsuits

Wright’s hip implants were manufactured by the company’s OrthoRecon division. Wright sold OrthoRecon in 2013 but remained legally responsible for lawsuits over its hips. Wright Medical no longer manufactures hip implants.

Wright hips named in lawsuits:

  • Conserve Total Hip Implant System
  • Conserve Total A-Class Advanced Metal Hip Implant System
  • Conserve Resurfacing System
  • Profemur System
  • Dynasty hip implants
  • Lineage hip implants

The majority of lawsuits named Wright’s Conserve and Profemur hip devices. The MDL was limited to only Conserve hips and Profemur System parts related to certain Conserve components.

See if You Qualify for a Lawsuit Our Partners

Our Trusted Legal Partners

Drugwatch partners with trusted law firms to help you take legal action. After submitting the form, one of Drugwatch's partners will contact you for a free case review.

simmons hanly conroy law firm logo weitz and luxenberg logo sokolove law firm logo levin papantonio rafferty law firm logo nigh goldenberg raso and vaughn law firm logo morgan & morgan logo the ferraro law firm logo meirowitz & wasserberg law firm logo

Hip Failure Rate Higher than Expected

Studies and reports to federal regulators have found many Wright hip implants failed sooner or more often than expected.

A 2016 review published in The Open Orthopaedics Journal found a high failure rate among patients who received Wright Conserve hips. The study looked at 92 patients who received a Conserve hip between 2005 and 2010. It found that nearly 1 in every 5 patients needed revision surgery to correct problems with the devices. The average time between receiving a Wright hip replacement and requiring corrective surgery was just 4 1/2 years.

In 2015, the company that had purchased Wright Medical’s hip division started receiving a higher-than-expected number of reports of fractures with the Profemur. MicroPort Orthopedics recalled 10,825 of the devices.

“If the modular neck fractures, the patient may experience sudden pain, instability and difficulty walking and performing common task.”

The FDA declared the Profemur recall a Class I recall, the agency’s most serious type. The recall notice warned that an acute fracture of the device would require emergency surgery. It also warned that such a fracture in a Profemur hip stem could “lead to neurovascular damage, hematoma, hemorrhage, and even death.

People filed their lawsuits based on the failure of these hips and the complications that occurred as a result.

Lawsuit Examples
John Wallace
John Wallace of Arizona received a Conserve implant in his left hip in 2005. In December 2011, his doctor found elevated chromium and cobalt levels in his blood. Wallace required revision surgery which led to further complications including a “spontaneous dislocation” of the hip.
Linda Bohnenstiehl
Linda Bohnenstiehl of Illinois received Conserve and Profemur hip devices in a Missouri hospital in 2008. She claimed that the Profemur device fractured at the femoral neck in 2010, causing her physical injuries, debilitation and pain and suffering. The injuries forced her to have a revision surgery.
Leon Thomas
Leon Thomas of Arkansas received a Conserve Total Hip System in 2006. He began experiencing severe pain in his left hip and groin in 2011 and was forced to have revision surgery. His doctor suspected a loose hip socket, and he found elevated chromium and cobalt levels in his blood. Thomas’ lawsuit claimed he was permanently impaired and suffered ongoing discomfort from nerve damage and other injuries.

Juries Award $15.5 Million, Wright Offers $330 Million in Settlements

Two juries returned verdicts totaling $15.5 million against Wright in lawsuits over the company’s hip replacements. The back-to-back losses appear to have motivated the company to offer up $330 million through two settlements to resolve the remaining cases.

Timeline of Verdicts and Settlements
  • November 2013
    Wright settled the first lawsuit over its Profemur hip stem for an undisclosed amount five days before trial. Plaintiff Timothy Courson had claimed permanent injuries and had sought $3 million in damages.
  • June 2015
    A California jury awarded Alan Warner $4.5 million in the first Wright hip lawsuit to go to trial. Warner claimed the Profemur device snapped while he was walking. The court later reduced the award to $1 million.
  • November 2015
    Jury awarded $11 million to former ski instructor Robyn Christiansen after finding a Conserve implant caused tissue damage. The court later reduced the amount to $2.1 million.
  • November 2016
    Wright settled 1,292 lawsuits in the federal MDL and the consolidated court action in California for a total of $240 million.
  • October 2017
    Wright agreed to settle roughly 600 remaining hip lawsuits for $90 million.
  • June 2018
    A judge closed the Wright MDL, barring new lawsuits.
  • September 2019
    Wright estimated it would make the final payment to patients by this date.
Show More
Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.