Wright Medical agreed to two settlements totaling $330 million to resolve hundreds of lawsuits over its hip-replacement implants. The company no longer makes hip implants.
Did you or a loved one suffer complications after receiving a hip implant? You may be eligible for compensation.
Facing roughly 2,000 lawsuits after selling its hip-implant manufacturing operations, Wright Medical sought to settle cases. Only two lawsuits ever made it to trial ahead of the settlements, and Wright lost both of those.
In October 2017, Wright Medical agreed to settle all remaining hip-implant lawsuits against the company for $90 million. This followed an earlier settlement in November 2016 when the company settled more than 1,200 lawsuits over its hip implants for $240 million.
As of March 2018, there were still 322 lawsuits pending in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) eligible for the latest settlement. No additional lawsuits could be added to the MDL after October 18, 2017. The 2017 settlement also applied to dozens of cases that were still pending in a Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding in California state court.
Wright’s hip implants were manufactured by the company’s OrthoRecon division. Wright sold OrthoRecon in 2013, but remained legally responsible for lawsuits over its hips. Wright Medical no longer manufactures hip implants.
Most people who filed lawsuits over Wright hip replacements claimed the devices released metal toxins that caused tissue damage and could cause the implants to fail. Others claimed the devices failed prematurely.
Metallosis was blamed on wear between the metal components of the hip implants. The parts rubbing against each other released microscopic metal ions into patients’ bodies. These metal particles can destroy muscle, bone and other tissue around the implants.
John Wallace of Arizona received a Conserve implant in his left hip in 2005. In December 2011, his doctor found elevated chromium and cobalt levels in his blood. Wallace required revision surgery which led to further complications including a “spontaneous dislocation” of the hip.
Linda Bohnenstiehl of Illinois received Conserve and Profemur hip devices in a Missouri hospital in 2008. She alleged that the Profemur device fractured at the femoral neck in 2010, causing her physical injuries, debilitation and pain and suffering. The injuries forced her to have a revision surgery.
Leon Thomas of Arkansas received a Conserve Total Hip System in 2006. He began experiencing severe pain in his left hip and groin in 2011 and was forced to have revision surgery. His doctor suspected a loose hip socket, and he found elevated chromium and cobalt levels in his blood. Thomas is permanently impaired and suffers ongoing discomfort from nerve damage, drop foot and other injuries.
People injured by Wright hip implants claim the company knew about the risks its devices posed but did not do enough to prevent problems or to warn the public.
Wright’s Conserve and Profemur hip devices were named in the majority of lawsuits. The MDL was limited to only Conserve hips and Profemur System components connected to certain Conserve components.
In February 2012, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) centralized lawsuits involving Conserve hip implants to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. More than 640 lawsuits over the devices would eventually be included in the multidistrict litigation (MDL).
In April 2012, the first of dozens more Wright hip lawsuits filed in California state courts were combined into a Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (JCCP) in Los Angeles Superior Court.
MDLs and JCCPs allow parties in several similar lawsuits improve communication, reduce costs and increase court efficiency.
Two juries returned verdicts totaling $15.5 million against Wright in lawsuits over the company’s hip replacements. The company eventually offered $330 million through two settlements to resolve roughly 2,000 lawsuits against the company.
There are currently no class-action lawsuits involving Wright Medical hip replacement implants.
Class actions are single lawsuits filed by one or a few people on behalf of a larger group. In the case of Wright hips, hundreds of people filed their own individual lawsuits. Most of these were combined in either the federal MDL in Atlanta or in the state JCCP in Los Angeles.
Studies and reports to federal regulators have found many Wright hip implants failed sooner or more often than expected.
A review of 92 patients who received Wright Conserve hips between 2005 and 2010 found that nearly 1 in every 5 patients needed revision surgery to correct problems with the devices. The average time between receiving a Wright hip replacement and requiring corrective surgery was just 4 1/2 years.
In 2015, the company that had purchased Wright Medical’s hip division started receiving a higher-than-expected number of reports of fractures with the Profemur. MicroPort Orthopedics recalled 10,825 of the devices.
“If the modular neck fractures, the patient may experience sudden pain, instability and difficulty walking and performing common task.”
The FDA declared the Profemur recall a Class I recall, the agency’s most serious type. The recall notice warned that an acute fracture of the device would require emergency surgery. It also warned that such a fracture in a Profemur hip stem could “lead to neurovascular damage, hematoma, hemorrhage, and even death.”
Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions.
Calling this number connects you with Wilson and Peterson, LLP or one of its trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Wilson and Peterson, LLP funds Drugwatch because it supports the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices.(855) 396-3709