Danish manufacturer Coloplast increased the transvaginal mesh litigation provision in its budget by 3 billion Danish crowns ($448 million).
The provision is set aside to cover settlement and legal costs in the U.S. More than 2,000 lawsuits against Coloplast are pending in a multidistrict litigation court in the Southern District of West Virginia.
“We have been ordered by the judicial system in the U.S. to take preliminary steps towards actual litigation on 200 specific cases,” Coloplast president and CEO Lars Rasmussen said in a press release. “This means that our costs in relation to the litigation will increase. As a consequence, we have found it necessary to increase our provision.”
Coloplast settled 400 lawsuits for $16 million in 2014 and set aside 1 billion Danish crowns ($186 million) plus 500 million Danish crowns ($93 million) worth of insurance for future legal costs. Now the total provision sits around $727 million.
“Going forward, we do not wish to disclose the number of claims against Coloplast because of the confidentiality of the current settlement negotiations,” Rasmussen said. “But with the knowledge available to us today it is our best estimate that the 4.5 billion (Danish crowns) will cover the total costs of all claims.”
More than 80,000 lawsuits in six MDLs were filed against mesh manufacturers. The plaintiffs claim the devices, used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, injured them. Manufacturers agreed to settlements or lost verdicts resulting in more than $1 billion in payments to victims during the past decade.
The increase in the budget provision hampered Coloplast’s financial outlook for the fiscal year. The company issued its third profit warning to investors in 2015 which decreased its shares seven percent, according to Reuters.
Nordic financial advisor Nordea advised its clients: “This amount exceeds our expectations, although we saw a risk of the outcome being worse than the initial provision.”
It’s unclear if Coloplast will use the multi-million dollar provision to settle cases or fight them. Thousands of cases against other manufacturers are still pending in MDL courts across the U.S.
Drugwatch.com writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.
Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.
Drugwatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.(888) 645-1617