ALERT: Your health is top priority. We’re committed to providing reliable COVID-19 resources to keep you informed and safe.

$245M Award OK’d for 6 DePuy Pinnacle Hip Patients


Editors carefully fact-check all Drugwatch content for accuracy and quality.

Drugwatch has a stringent fact-checking process. It starts with our strict sourcing guidelines.

We only gather information from credible sources. This includes peer-reviewed medical journals, reputable media outlets, government reports, court records and interviews with qualified experts.

Judge with a gavel

Six people who sued over injuries from DePuy Orthopaedics hip replacements will split a $245 million judgment. Individual awards will range from $36 million to more than $48 million.

A federal judge in Texas entered the final judgment August 29, — nine months after a jury returned a $247 million verdict in their case. The plaintiffs agreed to the slightly smaller amount after private insurance agreed to cover $1.2 million of their medical expenses.

Thousands of DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement lawsuits are still pending in federal court.

The people who sued had claimed DePuy Orthopaedics and its parent company, Johnson & Johnson, knew Pinnacle hips were defective. The companies never issued a major Pinnacle hip replacement recall, but quietly phased out the model blamed for injuries in the lawsuits.

The devices were a metal-on-metal design. They formed an artificial hip joint with a metal ball in a metal socket or cup. Movement in the joint released microscopic metallic ions. These caused serious hip replacement complications that could damage bone and muscle and lead to the implant’s failure.

Pinnacle Hip Complications Helped Determine Awards

The six people in the Texas case received different amounts of the judgment. The individual amounts were based on the number and extent of their specific injuries. Injuries included past and future medical expenses as well as pain and suffering.

DePuy Plaintiffs and Judgment Amounts

Plaintiff Amount
Karen Kirschner $48.6 million
Hazel Miura $43.7 million
Ureil Barzel $39.2 million
Ramon Alicea $38.9 million
Michael Stevens $37.8 million
Eugene Stevens $36.8 million


The bulk of the original jury award came in the form of $90 million in punitive damages. That is money a jury may award to punish a defendant. Juries award punitive damages if they decide a defendant’s actions were especially harmful. The judge did not alter this amount.

The jury awarded $77 million for damages to the patients who received Pinnacle hip implants. The insurance payments reduced this by $1.2 million.

The jury also awarded four of the patients’ spouses a total of $1.7 million for loss of consortium. That is a legal term for people denied the benefits of a family relationship due to their injuries.

Injured by complications related to hip replacements? Get a Free Case Review

Thousands More Pinnacle Hip Lawsuits Await Action

The August judgment follows a jury verdict for the six plaintiffs in November 2017.  The trial was part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving more than 9,600 Pinnacle hip replacement lawsuits. MDLs allow federal courts to combine several similar hip replacement lawsuits for efficiency.

This case was the fourth bellwether trial in the MDL. Bellwethers are test cases that can gauge arguments on both sides. Their outcomes can lead people to drop lawsuits or they can help shape court settlements.

After DePuy won the first bellwether in 2014, juries have sided with the people claiming injuries in the last three. Verdicts have totaled more than $1.7 billion. But appeals have reduced the total to around $938 million.

DePuy and Johnson & Johnson are expected to appeal the latest judgment.

The MDL has been underway since May 2011.

Terry Turner
Written By Terry Turner Writer

Terry Turner has been writing articles and producing news broadcasts for more than 25 years. He covers FDA policy, proton pump inhibitors, and medical devices such as hernia mesh, IVC filters, and hip and knee implants. An Emmy-winning journalist, he has reported on health and medical policy issues before Congress, the FDA and other federal agencies. Some of his qualifications include:

  • American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) and The Alliance of Professional Health Advocates member
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Literacy certificates
  • Original works published or cited in Washington Examiner, MedPage Today and The New York Times
  • Appeared as an expert panelist on hernia mesh lawsuits on the BBC
Edited By

10 Cited Research Articles writers follow rigorous sourcing guidelines and cite only trustworthy sources of information, including peer-reviewed journals, court records, academic organizations, highly regarded nonprofit organizations, government reports and interviews with qualified experts. Review our editorial policy to learn more about our process for producing accurate, current and balanced content.

  1. Bayles, C. (2018, August 29). J&J Hip Implant Plaintiffs Get $245M Judgment After Trial. Law360. Retrieved from
  2. Taylor, N.P. (2018, April 26). Johnson & Johnson Appeal of $151M Hip Implant Ruling Succeeds After Judge Finds Talk of Iraqi Bribes Tainted Case. FierceBiotech. Retrieved from
  3. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2018, August 15). MDL Statistics Report - Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by District. Retrieved from
  4. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2011, May 24). Transfer Order. Retrieved from
  5. Bellon, T. (2017, November 16). Johnson & Johnson hit with $247 Million Verdict in Hip Implant Trial. Retrieved from
  6. Dye, J. & Garza, L.M. (2014, October 23). Johnson & Johnson DePuy Wins First Trial Over Pinnacle Hips. Retrieved from
  7. Harris, A. & Voreacos, D. (2013, March 12). J&J Faces Second Trial Over Recalled Hip After Loss. Bloomberg. Retrieved from
  8. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas Dallas Division. (2012, August 14). In Re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Case Management Order No. 8 [Schedule of Pretrial Matters]. Retrieved from
  9. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas Dallas Division. (2013, September 30). In Re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implants Products Liability Litigation Agreed Order Staying Cases Pending Bellwether Trials. Retrieved from
  10. Feeley, J. and Hasselle, D. (2017, December 7). J&J Faces High-Stakes Appeal to Toss Pinnacle Hips Judgement. Retrieved from
View All Sources
Call to speak with a legal expert
Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with one of Drugwatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

Drugwatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.

(877) 280-3908