Did you know this version of Internet Explorer is out of date?

To get the latest experience from our website, please upgrade your browser.

Have a drug or medical device concern?


Hip Replacement Lawsuit

Thousands of lawsuits piled up after hip implant recipients banked on the promise of reduced pain and greater mobility only to suffer complications far more debilitating. Allegations include faulty designs and serious complications like metallosis. These side effects resulted in many hip recipients needing new implants and multiple revision surgeries.

Have you developed complications after a hip replacement? You might be entitled to compensation.

Major Manufacturers Face Lawsuits

Several total hip implant manufacturers are involved in lawsuits because of complications suffered by people who received faulty devices. These plaintiffs claim the companies made defective products and failed to warn the public about the risks.

One of the largest device manufactures, Johnson & Johnson's DePuy unit, faced nearly 12,000 lawsuits filed by people who received the ASR hip. DePuy paid $2.5 billion to settle 7,500 of the ASR claims in 2013. The all-metal devices were supposed to last longer than other implants on the market. Instead, they failed prematurely in thousands of people.

In March 2015, a jury ordered DePuy to pay $502 million to five plaintiffs who said their Pinnacle Ultramet implants were faulty. Thousands of DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits are pending in federal court.

A host of other manufacturers whose metal-on-metal (MoM) implants caused various complications that led to risky, painful surgeries to correct problems and replace the implants are still facing lawsuits.

Hip Replacement Implants Involved in Possible Lawsuits

DePuy Orthopaedics

  • ASR XL Acetabular System
  • ASR Hip Resurfacing System
  • Pinnacle

Zimmer Holdings

  • Durom Cup

Stryker Orthopaedics

  • ABG II modular-neck hip stems
  • Rejuvenate

Wright Medical Technology

Smith & Nephew

  • Emperion Hip System
  • Birmingham Hip
  • Modular SMF Hip System (MIS Hip Stem)
  • Modular Redapt Revision Femoral Hip System


Recent News and Verdicts

Lawsuits Can Compensate Victims

Following a failed hip replacement, tens of thousands of patients are left with physical, mental and emotional burdens. Filing a lawsuit may provide some compensation for these injuries and allow patients and their families to move on with their lives.

Medical Bills

Hip replacement injuries can be permanent. Some require revision surgery and medical care that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. These costs can include doctor’s visits, tests, medication and hospitalization.

Pain and Suffering

Coping with these injuries can also carry a high emotional toll. Discomfort resulting from device failure can immobilize patients and interfere with their ability to work and participate in other activities.

Lost Wages and Damaged Relationships

Compensatory Damages: Including caregiving services and lost income. Loss of Consortium: Damages to relationship with spouse. Punitive Damages: Awards to discourage similar conduct.

Lost Wages and Damaged Relationships

People injured by hip implants often need long recovery times that prevent them from working. Sometimes, the disability is permanent and hip patients and their families suffer financially for the rest of their lives. Spouses lose the care and companionship of their husbands and wives.

Hip Replacement Injuries Claimed in Lawsuits

Hip implants do not come without risk or complications, but people file lawsuits when their hip implant fails prematurely or because they claim the device is defective. In the case of hip implants with metal-on-metal components, plaintiffs who required revision surgery claim the devices' design is to blame for causing their injuries. The plaintiffs say metal debris soaks into patients' bloodstreams, causing infections and other problems. There are a number of injuries mentioned in lawsuits.

Decreased Mobility

Severe Pain in The Hip, Groin or Thigh

Inflammation and Swelling

Loosening of the Device

Bone Damage



Metal Poisoning

Hip Joint Failure

Filing a Hip Replacement Lawsuit

If you received a faulty hip implant, you should talk to a a qualified device attorney with experience in hip replacement lawsuits about whether you are eligible to recover damages. There are a handful of things to keep in mind about filing a claim. Those include knowing that a lawsuit may bring you more compensation than a recall and knowing exactly what a product liability attorney can do for you.

Gavel in Courtroom

Lawsuit vs. Recall

A lawsuit may offer you more compensation than a recall. Device makers may offer compensation as part of a recall. But they will likely limit compensation to certain medical treatments and revisions. They may not address potential losses like lost wages and pain and suffering. According to some patients, DePuy only covered a fraction of revision costs under their recall, leaving injured patients to foot the rest of the bill. Talk to a lawyer about how a lawsuit may offer more compensation.

Class-Action Lawsuit

Consider talking to a lawyer about risks and benefits of joining a class-action lawsuit. A class action is a lawsuit filed collectively by a large group of people with similar claims. Class-action claimants generally have less control over their cases, including negotiating settlement terms, than individual claimants. However, these groups often have leverage to reach large settlements. Before joining a class action, consider talking to an attorney about the risks and benefits of filing your claim individually.

Statue Outside Courthouse
Hallway Leading to Courthouse

Think about a Settlement

A qualified device attorney may be able to help you obtain a settlement. These attorneys are knowledgeable about hip replacement injuries and device makers. They can use their experience to help you make decisions like whether to file a claim, go to trial or accept a settlement. Remember that each case is different. It is always best to speak with a qualified attorney for specific information about your legal rights and any available compensation.

Plaintiffs File Lawsuits Vs. Stryker and Johnson & Johnson

Hip replacement makers are under a legal duty to design and manufacture and test properly the safety of their devices. They are also accountable for responsibly marketing their products and properly warning the public about any health risks. When they fail at or ignore those duties, the patients who suffer from their negligence may have legal claims to compensation for their injuries.

Diane Pingel

Diane Pingel

Diane Pingel filed a lawsuit against Stryker after she underwent five surgeries to repair tissue and bone damage caused by metal particles flaking off her Rejuvenate hip implant. During one of the surgeries, her femur broke, and her doctor placed a metal rod in her leg. Because she has a Rejuvenate in both hips, the other hip will also need to be replaced. She is one of a growing number of individuals who are filing lawsuits over Stryker’s Rejuvenate and ABG II hip implants.

Loren Kransky

Loren Kransky, a former corrections officer, sued DePuy after he was implanted with the ASR and experienced “a kind of stabbing pain” that prevented him from walking and from rehabilitating after a stroke and forced him to use a wheelchair. Doctors tested Kransky’s blood and found high levels of cobalt and chromium were poisoning him. A Los Angeles jury found that the ASR was defective in design and awarded the Kranskys $8.3 million.

Loren Kransky Suing Hip Manufacturers

Top Hip Settlements

While many people who file chose to go to trial and fight it out in court, some people may choose to opt for settlement. Some of these hip manufacturers set aside billions of dollars in funds to compensate injured plaintiffs — including some who may not have filed lawsuits yet. These settlements may require an attorney to file claims on behalf of patients.

Things to Keep in Mind about Hip Litigation

Whether you experienced injury or are concerned about future injuries, a qualified device attorney with experience in hip replacement lawsuits can help you protect your rights and any future legal claims. This includes protecting your legal claims while responding to a recall. In the past, device makers have been known to use patient information obtained through recalls to limit their liability.

Before filing a lawsuit against a hip manufacturer:

Talk to an experienced lawyer before signing anything or accepting any compensation

Device makers sometimes use recalls as an opportunity to get patients to sign waivers or accept a fixed amount of compensation. Doing either of these things may prevent you from filing a lawsuit later. So it is best to talk to a lawyer first. Keep in mind that your injuries may be permanent and require ongoing care. A lawsuit may offer a better opportunity to receive compensation for the costs of ongoing care.

Be aware when calling a device maker’s helpline

Device makers sometimes use patient call centers to get information to limit legal claims. Before you talk to a device maker or recall call center representative, keep in mind that you may not yet know the extent of your injuries. Talk to a lawyer first to avoid saying anything that could hurt your potential claim.

Speak to a lawyer before turning over evidence

Also keep in mind that your physician or surgeon may try to turn over evidence in your case, including the failed hip device. In the past, device makers have reportedly paid doctors to turn over any faulty devices they remove. They may also work with doctors to obtain other medical information related to your claim. So talk to a lawyer experienced in the area of dangerous medical devices to find out how to protect yourself when seeking medical help for your injuries.

Consider getting a second opinion

During recalls, device makers often provide information about revision surgery and other treatment. However, their recommendations may not be appropriate for you. Consider getting a second opinion before committing to a particular treatment plan.

Share This Page:
View Sources
  1. Gomez, P.F., and Morcuende, J.A. (2005). Early Attempts at Hip Arthroplasty: 1700s to 1950s. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, volume #(25) 25–29. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1888777/pdf/IowaOrthopJ-25-025.pdf
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Concerns about Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Systems. Retrieved August 30, 2012, from http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm
  3. Pandit, H., et al. (July 2008). Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, volume #(90) 847-851. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18591590
  4. Donnelly, L. (2012, February 4). Hip replacement patients could face increased risk of cancer. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/9061781/Hip-replacement-patients-could-face-increased-risk-of-cancer.html
  5. Meier, B. and Roberts, J. (2011, August 22). Hip Implant Complaints Surge, Even as the Dangers Are Studied. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/business/complaints-soar-on-hip-implants-as-dangers-are-studied.html?scp=5&sq=depuy%20hip%20replacement&st=cse
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (n.d.). Recalls Specific to Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Systems. Retrieved August 30, 2012, from http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241770.htm
  7. Stryker Orthopaedics. (2012, July 6). Stryker Initiates Voluntary Product Recall of Modular-Neck Stems [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm311043.htm
  8. Kelley, T. (2012, April 3). U.K. Agency Urges Ban on Metal Hip Implant Combination. Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-03/u-k-agency-urges-ban-on-metal-hip-implant-combination-1-.html
  9. Searcey, D. (2012, December 17). DePuy’s Hip Replacement: The New Big Thing in Product Liability Suits? Message posted to http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/12/17/depuys-hip-replacement-the-new-big-thing-in-product-liability-suits/
  10. In Re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2197. (December 2010).
  11. Possley, M., Voreacos, D., & Pettersson, E. (2013, March 8). J&J must pay $8.3 million over defective hip, jury says. Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-03-08/j-j-must-pay-8-3-million-in-suit-over-defective-hip-jury-says
  12. Singer, S. (2013, January 27). Artificial hips corrode, poisoning some patients, local lawsuits say. Palm Beach Post. Retrieved from http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/lifestyles/health/artificial-hips-corrode-poisoning-some-patients-lo/nT7jf/
  13. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2013, March 5). MDL Statistics Report – Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets. Retrieved from http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_by_District-March-5-2013.pdf
  14. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-12/j-j-said-to-reach-4-billion-deal-to-settle-hip-lawsuits.html
Free Hip Replacements Case Review